Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Clinical Stage I Seminoma: An Individual Patient Data Analysis by the European Association of Urology Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel and Guidelines Office.

Prognosis Relapse Risk factors Seminoma testis Testicular cancer

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 07 09 2023
revised: 28 09 2023
accepted: 18 10 2023
medline: 12 11 2023
pubmed: 12 11 2023
entrez: 11 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The relapse rate in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (SGCTT) who were undergoing surveillance after radical orchidectomy is 4-30%, depending on tumor size and rete testis invasion (RTI). However, the level of evidence supporting the use of both risk factors in clinical decision-making is low. We aimed to identify the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI SGCTT patients. Individual patient data for 1016 CSI SGCTT patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2019 with normal postorchidectomy serum tumor marker levels and undergoing surveillance were collected from nine institutions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were fit to identify the most important prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse by imaging and/or markers. Relapse probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. After a median follow-up of 7.7 yr, 149 (14.7%) patients had relapsed. Categorical tumor size (≤2, >2-5, and >5 cm), presence of RTI, and lymphovascular invasion were used to form three risk groups: low (56.4%), intermediate (41.3%), and high (2.3%) risks with 5-yr cumulative relapse probabilities of 8%, 20%, and 44%, respectively. The model outperformed the currently used model with tumor size ≤4 versus >4 cm and presence of RTI (Harrell's C index 0.65 vs 0.61). The low- and intermediate-risk groups were validated successfully in an independent cohort of 285 patients. The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in CSI SGCTT patients under surveillance is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse. The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in patients with clinical stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The relapse rate in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (SGCTT) who were undergoing surveillance after radical orchidectomy is 4-30%, depending on tumor size and rete testis invasion (RTI). However, the level of evidence supporting the use of both risk factors in clinical decision-making is low.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to identify the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI SGCTT patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
Individual patient data for 1016 CSI SGCTT patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2019 with normal postorchidectomy serum tumor marker levels and undergoing surveillance were collected from nine institutions.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were fit to identify the most important prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse by imaging and/or markers. Relapse probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
After a median follow-up of 7.7 yr, 149 (14.7%) patients had relapsed. Categorical tumor size (≤2, >2-5, and >5 cm), presence of RTI, and lymphovascular invasion were used to form three risk groups: low (56.4%), intermediate (41.3%), and high (2.3%) risks with 5-yr cumulative relapse probabilities of 8%, 20%, and 44%, respectively. The model outperformed the currently used model with tumor size ≤4 versus >4 cm and presence of RTI (Harrell's C index 0.65 vs 0.61). The low- and intermediate-risk groups were validated successfully in an independent cohort of 285 patients.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in CSI SGCTT patients under surveillance is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in patients with clinical stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37951820
pii: S2588-9311(23)00232-8
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Joost L Boormans (JL)

Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.boormans@erasmusmc.nl.

Richard Sylvester (R)

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Brussels, Belgium.

Lynn Anson-Cartwright (L)

Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Rachel M Glicksman (RM)

European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Robert J Hamilton (RJ)

Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Ezra Hahn (E)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Gedske Daugaard (G)

Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jakob Lauritsen (J)

Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Thomas Wagner (T)

Department of Oncology 5073, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Barbara Avuzzi (B)

Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Nicola Nicolai (N)

Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Xavier García Del Muro (XG)

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain(1).

Jorge Aparicio (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain(1).

Odile Stalder (O)

Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Christian Rothermundt (C)

Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Stefanie Fischer (S)

Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

M Pilar Laguna (MP)

Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH