Detection and agreement of event-based OCT and OCTA analysis for glaucoma progression.


Journal

Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 19 04 2023
accepted: 26 10 2023
revised: 19 10 2023
medline: 12 11 2023
pubmed: 12 11 2023
entrez: 11 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To examine event-based glaucoma progression using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA). In this retrospective study, glaucoma eyes with ≥2-year and 4-visits of OCT/OCTA imaging were included. Peripapillary capillary density (CD) and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) were obtained from 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm optic nerve head (ONH) scans. Event-based OCT/OCTA progression was defined as decreases in ONH measurements exceeding test-retest variability on ≥2 consecutive visits. Visual field (VF) progression was defined as significant VF mean deviation worsening rates on ≥2 consecutive visits. Inter-instrument agreement on progression detection was compared using kappa(κ) statistics. Among 147 eyes (89 participants), OCTA and OCT identified 33(22%) and 25(17%) progressors, respectively. They showed slight agreement (κ = 0.06), with 7(5%) eyes categorized as progressors by both. When incorporating both instruments, the rate of progressors identified increased to 34%. Similar agreement was observed in diagnosis- and severity-stratified analyses (κ < 0.10). Compared to progressors identified only by OCT, progressors identified only by OCTA tended to have thinner baseline RNFL and worse baseline VF. VF progression was identified in 11(7%) eyes. OCT and VF showed fair agreement (κ = 0.26), with 6(4%) eyes categorized as progressors by both. OCTA and VF showed slight agreement (κ = 0.08), with 4(3%) eyes categorized as progressors by both. OCT and OCTA showed limited agreement on event-based progression detection, with OCT showing better agreement with VF. Both OCT and OCTA detected more progressors than VF. OCT and OCTA may provide valuable, yet different and complementary, information about glaucoma progression.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37951976
doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02817-0
pii: 10.1038/s41433-023-02817-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)
ID : R01EY034148
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)
ID : R01EY011008
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)
ID : R01EY019869
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)
ID : R01EY027510
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)
ID : P30EY022589
Organisme : UC | UC San Francisco | Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education)
ID : T31IP1511
Organisme : Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB)
ID : Unrestricted Grant

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.

Références

Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. Jama. 2014;311:1901–11.
pubmed: 24825645 pmcid: 4523637 doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192
Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:688–710.
pubmed: 17889587 pmcid: 2110881 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001
Kuang TM, Zhang C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA. Estimating Lead Time Gained by Optical Coherence Tomography in Detecting Glaucoma before Development of Visual Field Defects. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2002–9.
pubmed: 26198809 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.015
Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. The Structure and Function Relationship in Glaucoma: Implications for Detection of Progression and Measurement of Rates of Change. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6939–46.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10345
Mwanza J-C, Chang RT, Budenz DL, Durbin MK, Gendy MG, Shi W, et al. Reproducibility of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Nerve Head Parameters Measured with Cirrus HD-OCT in Glaucomatous Eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5724–30.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5222
González-García AO, Vizzeri G, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:1067–74.1074.e1061.
pubmed: 19268891 pmcid: 3465966 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.032
Wu JH, Moghimi S, Nishida T, Walker E, Kamalipour A, Li E, et al. Evaluation of the long-term variability of macular OCT/OCTA and visual field parameters. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022:bjo-2022-322470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-322470 . Epub ahead of print.
Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA, Belghith A. Estimating Optical Coherence Tomography Structural Measurement Floors to Improve Detection of Progression in Advanced Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:37–44.
pubmed: 27914978 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.010
Mwanza JC, Kim HY, Budenz DL, Warren JL, Margolis M, Lawrence SD, et al. Residual and Dynamic Range of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma: Comparison of Three OCT Platforms. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:6344–51.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17248
Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, Suh MH, Manalastas PI, Fatehee N, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:OCT451–9.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18944
Akil H, Huang AS, Francis BA, Sadda SR, Chopra V. Retinal vessel density from optical coherence tomography angiography to differentiate early glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma and normal eyes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170476.
pubmed: 28152070 pmcid: 5289421 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170476
Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Weinreb RN, Dasari S, Riyazuddin M, Raveendran S, et al. Relationship of Optic Nerve Structure and Function to Peripapillary Vessel Density Measurements of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:548–54.
pubmed: 28333896 doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000670
Lin YH, Huang SM, Yeung L, Ku WC, Chen HS, Lai CC, et al. Correlation of Visual Field With Peripapillary Vessel Density Through Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Normal-Tension Glaucoma. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:26.
pubmed: 33364080 pmcid: 7746955 doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.26
Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, Suh MH, Yousefi S, Saunders LJ, et al. Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2498–508.
pubmed: 27726964 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.041
Nishida T, Moghimi S, Wu J-H, Chang AC, Diniz-Filho A, Kamalipour A, et al. Association of Initial Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density Loss With Faster Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140:319–26.
pubmed: 35201270 pmcid: 8874898 doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.6433
Liao MT, Lin MH, Tsai HE, Wu JH, Caffrey JL, Lin JW, et al. Risk stratification and cost-effectiveness analysis of adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Eval Clin Pr. 2022;28:615–23.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13681
Moghimi S, Zangwill LM, Penteado RC, Hasenstab K, Ghahari E, Hou H, et al. Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1720–8.
pubmed: 29907322 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.006
Wu J-H, Moghimi S, Nishida T, Proudfoot JA, Kamalipour A, Zangwill LM et al. Correlation of ganglion cell complex thinning with baseline deep and superficial macular vessel density in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107:953–8.
Moghimi S, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Penteado RC, Hasenstab K, Hou H, et al. Measurement Floors and Dynamic Ranges of OCT and OCT Angiography in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:980–8.
pubmed: 30858023 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.003
Nishida T, Moghimi S, Hou H, Proudfoot JA, Chang AC, David RCC, et al. Long-term reproducibility of optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy and stable glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107:657–62.
Hou H, Moghimi S, Proudfoot JA, Ghahari E, Penteado RC, Bowd C, et al. Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness and Macular Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:1043–52.
pubmed: 32085875 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.12.030
Shin JW, Song MK, Kook MS. Association Between Progressive Retinal Capillary Density Loss and Visual Field Progression in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients According to Disease Stage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:137–47.
pubmed: 33524366 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.015
Leung CK, Chiu V, Weinreb RN, Liu S, Ye C, Yu M, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1558–62.
pubmed: 21529954 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.026
Zhang X, Dastiridou A, Francis BA, Tan O, Varma R, Greenfield DS, et al. Comparison of Glaucoma Progression Detection by Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;184:63–74.
pubmed: 28964806 pmcid: 5894829 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.020
Nguyen AT, Greenfield DS, Bhakta AS, Lee J, Feuer WJ. Detecting Glaucoma Progression Using Guided Progression Analysis with OCT and Visual Field Assessment in Eyes Classified by International Classification of Disease Severity Codes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2:36–46.
pubmed: 32672556 doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.11.004
Lee A, Sung KR, Shin JW. Progression detection capabilities of circumpapillary and macular vessel density in advanced glaucomatous eyes. Sci Rep. 2022;12:12109.
pubmed: 35840610 pmcid: 9287351 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16083-9
Rao HL, Kumbar T, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Agreement between event-based and trend-based glaucoma progression analyses. Eye (Lond). 2013;27:803–8.
pubmed: 23598668 doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.77
Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:ii15–19.
pubmed: 24357497 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304326
Aref AA, Budenz DL. Detecting Visual Field Progression. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:S51–6.
pubmed: 29157362 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.010
Sample PA, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, Becerra LM, et al. The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): design and baseline data. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1136–45.
pubmed: 19752422 pmcid: 2761830 doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.187
Girkin CA, Sample PA, Liebmann JM, Jain S, Bowd C, Becerra LM, et al. African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): II. Ancestry differences in optic disc, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular structure in healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:541–50.
pubmed: 20457974 pmcid: 2910255 doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.49
Jia Y, Tan O, Tokayer J, Potsaid B, Wang Y, Liu JJ, et al. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2012;20:4710–25.
pubmed: 22418228 pmcid: 3381646 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.004710
Venugopal JP, Rao HL, Weinreb RN, Pradhan ZS, Dasari S, Riyazuddin M, et al. Repeatability of vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography in normal and glaucoma eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:352–7.
pubmed: 28739645 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310637
Vazirani J, Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Gupta P. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements across the glaucoma spectrum using optical coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:300–5.
pubmed: 26044467 pmcid: 4463552 doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.158064
Tan BB, Natividad M, Chua KC, Yip LW. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement between 2 spectral domain OCT instruments. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:266–73.
pubmed: 21637116 doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182071cdd
Manalastas PIC, Zangwill LM, Saunders LJ, Mansouri K, Belghith A, Suh MH, et al. Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:851–9.
pubmed: 28858159 pmcid: 5633505 doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000768
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
pubmed: 843571 doi: 10.2307/2529310
Gardiner SK, Demirel S. Detecting Change Using Standard Global Perimetric Indices in Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;176:148–56.
pubmed: 28130041 pmcid: 5376527 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.01.013
Kamalipour A, Moghimi S, Jacoba CM, Yarmohammadi A, Yeh K, Proudfoot JA, et al. Measurements of OCT Angiography Complement OCT for Diagnosing Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5:262–74.
pubmed: 34634501 doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.09.012
Hwang JC, Konduru R, Zhang X, Tan O, Francis BA, Varma R, et al. Relationship among Visual Field, Blood Flow, and Neural Structure Measurements in Glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:3020–6.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8552
Shin JW, Lee J, Kwon J, Jo Y, Jeong D, Shon G, et al. Relationship between macular vessel density and central visual field sensitivity at different glaucoma stages. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1827–33.
pubmed: 30679167 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312085
Wu J-H, Moghimi S, Nishida T, Mahmoudinezhad G, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Association of macular vessel density and ganglion cell complex thickness with central visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022:bjophthalmol-2022-321870. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2022-321870 . Epub ahead of print.
Hirasawa K, Smith CA, West ME, Sharpe GP, Shuba LM, Rafuse PE, et al. Discrepancy in Loss of Macular Perfusion Density and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Early Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;221:39–47.
pubmed: 32828878 doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.031
Leung CK-S, Cheung CYL, Weinreb RN, Qiu K, Liu S, Li H, et al. Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Progression in Glaucoma: A Study on Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Progression Analysis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:217–22.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3468
Hou HW, Lin C, Leung CK-S. Integrating Macular Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer and Parapapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements to Detect Glaucoma Progression. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:822–31.
pubmed: 29433852 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.027
Wong D, Chua J, Tan B, Yao X, Chong R, Sng CCA, et al. Combining OCT and OCTA for Focal Structure–Function Modeling in Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:8–8.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.15.8
Sakaguchi K, Higashide T, Udagawa S, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K. Comparison of Sectoral Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma: Vessel Density Versus Thickness in the Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5251–62.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21955

Auteurs

Jo-Hsuan Wu (JH)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Sasan Moghimi (S)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Takashi Nishida (T)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Golnoush Mahmoudinezhad (G)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Linda M Zangwill (LM)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Robert N Weinreb (RN)

Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. rweinreb@ucsd.edu.

Classifications MeSH