Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes when law enforcement arrives before emergency medical services.

Automated external defibrillator Basic Life Support Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation Dispatch Law enforcement Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Police

Journal

Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 14 09 2023
revised: 03 11 2023
accepted: 06 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
entrez: 12 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Law enforcement (LE) professionals are often dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) to provide early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) application with mixed evidence of a survival benefit. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate LE care in OHCA. This is a secondary analysis of adults with non-traumatic OHCA not witnessed by EMS and without bystander AED use from 2018-2021. Our primary outcome was survival with Cerebral Perfusion Category score ≤ 2 (functional survival). Our exposures included: LE On-scene Only (without providing care); LE CPR Only (without applying an AED); LE Ideal Care (ensuring CPR and AED application). Our control group had no LE arrival before EMS. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for confounders and stratified our analyses by patients with and without bystander CPR. There were 2569 adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from 2018-2021 meeting inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the odds of functional survival for LE On-scene Only (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.28 [0.47-3.45]), LE CPR Only (1.26 [0.80-1.99]), or LE Ideal Care (1.36 [0.79-2.33]). In patients without bystander CPR, LE Ideal Care had significantly higher odds of functional survival (2.01 [1.06-3.81]) compared to no LE on-scene, with no significant associations for LE On-scene Only or LE CPR Only. There were no significant differences by LE care in patients already receiving bystander CPR. LE arrival before EMS and ensuring both CPR and AED application is associated with significantly improved functional survival in OHCA patients not already receiving bystander CPR.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Law enforcement (LE) professionals are often dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) to provide early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) application with mixed evidence of a survival benefit. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate LE care in OHCA.
METHODS METHODS
This is a secondary analysis of adults with non-traumatic OHCA not witnessed by EMS and without bystander AED use from 2018-2021. Our primary outcome was survival with Cerebral Perfusion Category score ≤ 2 (functional survival). Our exposures included: LE On-scene Only (without providing care); LE CPR Only (without applying an AED); LE Ideal Care (ensuring CPR and AED application). Our control group had no LE arrival before EMS. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for confounders and stratified our analyses by patients with and without bystander CPR.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 2569 adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from 2018-2021 meeting inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the odds of functional survival for LE On-scene Only (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.28 [0.47-3.45]), LE CPR Only (1.26 [0.80-1.99]), or LE Ideal Care (1.36 [0.79-2.33]). In patients without bystander CPR, LE Ideal Care had significantly higher odds of functional survival (2.01 [1.06-3.81]) compared to no LE on-scene, with no significant associations for LE On-scene Only or LE CPR Only. There were no significant differences by LE care in patients already receiving bystander CPR.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
LE arrival before EMS and ensuring both CPR and AED application is associated with significantly improved functional survival in OHCA patients not already receiving bystander CPR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37952574
pii: S0300-9572(23)00771-2
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.110044
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110044

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Joshua R Lupton (JR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA. Electronic address: lupton@ohsu.edu.

Erika Johnson (E)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Brian Prigmore (B)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Mohamud R Daya (MR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Jonathan Jui (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Kathryn Thompson (K)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Jack Nuttall (J)

Washington County Public Health, USA.

Matthew R Neth (MR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Ritu Sahni (R)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Craig D Newgard (CD)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.

Classifications MeSH