Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability.

Anthropocene cultural evolution cumulative culture human evolution

Journal

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
entrez: 12 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Humans have evolved culturally and perhaps genetically to be unsustainable. We exhibit a deep and consistent pattern of short-term resource exploitation behaviours and institutions. We distinguish agentic and naturally selective forces in cultural evolution. Agentic forces are quite important compared to the blind forces (random variation and natural selection) in cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution. We need to use the agentic policy-making processes to evade the impact of blind natural selection. We argue that agentic forces became important during our Pleistocene history and into the Anthropocene present. Human creativity in the form of deliberate innovations and the deliberate selective diffusion of technical and social advances drove this process forward for a long time before planetary limits became a serious issue. We review models with multiple positive feedbacks that roughly fit this observed pattern. Policy changes in the case of large-scale existential threats like climate change are made by political and diplomatic agents grasping and moving levers of institutional power in order to avoid the operation of blind natural selection and agentic forces driven by narrow or short-term goals. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37952614
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0252
pmc: PMC10645076
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20220252

Références

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45150
pubmed: 23024804
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Oct;23(2):50-97
pubmed: 36227765
Science. 2009 Jun 5;324(5932):1298-301
pubmed: 19498164
Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1362-7
pubmed: 18323447
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):42-43
pubmed: 27846488
Perspect Biol Med. 2013 Winter;56(1):36-52
pubmed: 23748525
Science. 2001 Apr 27;292(5517):686-93
pubmed: 11326091
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e30
pubmed: 25347943
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004 Nov;79(4):849-69
pubmed: 15682873
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3416-20
pubmed: 18287028
Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):
pubmed: 34016754
Evol Anthropol. 2022 Jul;31(4):175-198
pubmed: 35485603
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2008 Jan;12(1):55-74
pubmed: 18157927
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108 Suppl 2:10918-25
pubmed: 21690340
Anim Cogn. 2006 Jan;9(1):36-46
pubmed: 16195914
Science. 2019 Apr 12;364(6436):132-134
pubmed: 30975879
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):55-68
pubmed: 31792402
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17758-64
pubmed: 23077256
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1669-1679
pubmed: 36138223
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7908-7914
pubmed: 28739950
J Hum Evol. 2001 Apr;40(4):289-99
pubmed: 11312582
Nature. 2017 Jun 7;546(7657):289-292
pubmed: 28593953
Nat Commun. 2018 May 25;9(1):2077
pubmed: 29802241
Hum Biol. 1959 Feb;31(1):21-31
pubmed: 13640649
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 31;377(1843):20200308
pubmed: 34894729
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2354-2365
pubmed: 31964839
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17671-4
pubmed: 19822753
Curr Biol. 2019 Oct 7;29(19):R982-R986
pubmed: 31593681
Nature. 2016 Oct 27;538(7626):506-509
pubmed: 27732586
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220257
pubmed: 37952623
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;22(7):651-665
pubmed: 29759889
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jun;119:14-26
pubmed: 29685751
Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):383-6
pubmed: 18480822
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):931-5
pubmed: 26699457
Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):502-7
pubmed: 17569824
Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):23
pubmed: 11780095
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 13;9(1):2321
pubmed: 29899424
Hum Biol. 2009 Apr;81(2-3):211-35
pubmed: 19943744
Science. 2011 Dec 16;334(6062):1512-6
pubmed: 22174243
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Feb;25(2):468-74
pubmed: 18093996
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 29;116(44):21966-21968
pubmed: 31636221
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):654-667
pubmed: 32466991
Curr Biol. 2022 Jun 20;32(12):R697-R708
pubmed: 35728555
Nature. 2011 Jul 13;475(7357):493-6
pubmed: 21753753
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 22;277(1693):2559-64
pubmed: 20392733
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1062-D1067
pubmed: 29165669

Auteurs

Peter J Richerson (PJ)

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, 95616, CA, USA.

Robert T Boyd (RT)

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, 85281, AZ, USA.

Charles Efferson (C)

Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH