Our fragile future under the cumulative cultural evolution of two technologies.
cultural evolution
human population
sustainability
technological progress
Journal
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
01
2025
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
13
11
2023
entrez:
12
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We derive and analyse a model with unusual features characterizing human activities over the long-run. First, human population dynamics draw heavily on consumer-resource modelling in ecology in that humans must consume biological resources to produce new humans. Second, the model also draws heavily from economic growth theory in that humans do not simply consume biological resources; they also produce the resources they consume. Finally, humans use two types of technology. Consumption technology affects the rate at which humans can extract resources. Production technology controls how effectively humans convert labour into new resources. The dynamics of both types of technology are subject to cumulative cultural evolutionary processes that allow both technological progress and regress. The resulting model exhibits a wide range of dynamical regimes. That said, the system is routinely sensitive to initial conditions, with wildly different outcomes given the same parameter values. Moreover, the system exhibits a basic fragility in the sense that human activities often lead to the endogenous extinction of the human species. This can happen gently, or it can follow periods of explosive human activity with super-exponential growth that ends in collapse. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37952623
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0257
pmc: PMC10645086
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20220257Références
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855
pubmed: 25592418
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 5;372(1735):
pubmed: 29061888
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 29;111(17):6147-52
pubmed: 24753577
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):7301-6
pubmed: 17438298
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220252
pubmed: 37952614
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 May;3(5):446-452
pubmed: 30936426
Front Physiol. 2022 May 04;13:859127
pubmed: 35600293
Am Econ Rev. 2011 Aug;101(5):2003-2041
pubmed: 25506082
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 20;10(1):4301
pubmed: 31541093
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):E6762-9
pubmed: 26598675
Science. 2011 Dec 16;334(6062):1512-6
pubmed: 22174243
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220256
pubmed: 37952621
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7486-91
pubmed: 24799689
Science. 2012 Mar 2;335(6072):1114-8
pubmed: 22383851
Science. 2019 Apr 12;364(6436):132-134
pubmed: 30975879
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Oct;23(2):50-97
pubmed: 36227765
Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):341-6
pubmed: 7618100
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2354-2365
pubmed: 31964839
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):412-23
pubmed: 21199845
Nature. 1976 Jun 10;261(5560):459-67
pubmed: 934280
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Aug;74(1):46-55
pubmed: 18571686
Nature. 2013 Nov 21;503(7476):389-91
pubmed: 24226775
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220257
pubmed: 37952623
Nature. 2009 Sep 24;461(7263):472-5
pubmed: 19779433
Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):755
pubmed: 11845198
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220254
pubmed: 37952624
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jul 1;13(7):266-70
pubmed: 21238295
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1540-2
pubmed: 16595560
Science. 1972 Aug 11;177(4048):516-9
pubmed: 17793852
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 May;89(2):284-301
pubmed: 24033987
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Nov 13;281(1774):20132511
pubmed: 24225461