Advancing PFAS characterization: Enhancing the total oxidizable precursor assay with improved sample processing and UV activation.

6:2 FTS AFFF Analysis PFOA PFOS TOP assay

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 09 07 2023
revised: 22 10 2023
accepted: 24 10 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
entrez: 12 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass over 9000 chemicals utilized in various industrial and commercial applications. However, the quantification of PFAS using standard commercial analytical methods is currently limited to <50 selected compounds. To address this issue, the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay was developed, allowing for the oxidative conversion of previously undetectable PFAS precursors into measurable PFAS. This study investigated different sample processing methods to address post-oxidation PFAS loss identified in literature. Using PFOS as a probe molecule, up to 50 % loss of PFOS was identified during sample work-up. It was determined that the use of mass-labelled PFOS and methanolic acetic acid to chemically quench the sample post-oxidation improved PFOS recovery and allowed for correction of any remaining PFOS loss. The use of ultraviolet (UV) light was then investigated as an activator in contrast to the standard thermal activation method. A comparative evaluation was conducted to assess the recovery and conversion of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFOS, and 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) using both the heat-activated and UV-activated TOP assays. Results demonstrated that the UV-activated TOP assay achieved complete (100 %) oxidation of 6:2 FTS within 7.5 min, resulting in a total yield of generated perfluorinated carboxylic acids (PFCAs) at 108 ± 8 %. The study concluded by investigating the UV-activated TOP assay for its application on various aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) formulations and two AFFF samples drained from military aircraft rescue firefighting vehicles (ARFFVs). Analysis of these AFFF samples were supported by high resolution mass spectrometry and an expanded analytical suite, identifying several fluorotelomer precursors. The findings of this study provide compelling evidence that modifications in sample processing, work-up procedures, expansion of initial PFAS calibration standards, and UV-activation methods enhance the TOP assay, positioning it as a more reliable and quantitative analytical tool for PFAS characterization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37952659
pii: S0048-9697(23)06772-4
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168145
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

168145

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

David Patch (D)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Natalia O'Connor (N)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Taylor Vereecken (T)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Daniel Murphy (D)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Gabriel Munoz (G)

Brace Water Center, Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QB H3A 0G4, Canada.

Ian Ross (I)

CDM Smith, 75 State St #701, Boston, MA 02109, United States of America.

Caitlin Glover (C)

Brace Water Center, Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QB H3A 0G4, Canada.

Jennifer Scott (J)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Iris Koch (I)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

Sébastien Sauvé (S)

Département de chimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2V 0B3, Canada.

Jinxia Liu (J)

Brace Water Center, Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QB H3A 0G4, Canada.

Kela Weber (K)

Environmental Sciences Group, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada. Electronic address: Kela.Weber@rmc.ca.

Classifications MeSH