Mapping the ratio of agricultural inputs to yields reveals areas with potentially less sustainable farming.


Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 02 06 2023
revised: 07 11 2023
accepted: 09 11 2023
medline: 30 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
entrez: 12 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Fertilisers and pesticides are major sources of the environmental harm that results from farming, yet it remains difficult to target reductions in their impacts without compromising food production. We suggest that calculating the ratio of agrochemical inputs to yield can provide an indication of the potential sustainability of farmland, with those areas that have high input relative to yield being considered as less sustainable. Here we design an approach to characterise such Input to Yield Ratios (IYR) for four inputs that can be plausibly linked to environmental impacts: the cumulative risk resulting from pesticide exposure for honeybees and for earthworms, and the amount of nitrogen or phosphorus fertiliser applied per unit area. We capitalise on novel national-scale data to assess IYR for wheat farming across all of England. High-resolution spatial patterns of IYR differed among the four inputs, but hotspots, where all four IYRs were high, were in key agricultural regions not usually characterised as having low suitability for cropping. By scaling the magnitude of each input against crop yield, the IYR does not penalise areas of high yield with higher inputs (important for food production), or areas with low yields but which are achieved with low inputs (important as low impact areas). Instead, the IYR provides a globally applicable framework for evaluating the broad patterns of trade-offs between production and environmental risk, as an indicator of the potential for harm, over large scales. Its use can thus inform targeting to improve agricultural sustainability, or where one might switch to other land uses such as ecosystem restoration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37952662
pii: S0048-9697(23)07119-X
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168491
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Agrochemicals 0
Fertilizers 0
Pesticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

168491

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

James M Bullock (JM)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. Electronic address: jmbul@ceh.ac.uk.

Susan G Jarvis (SG)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.

William N W Fincham (WNW)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Penicuik, Edinburgh, UK.

Hannah Risser (H)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.

Carolin Schultz (C)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.

David J Spurgeon (DJ)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.

John W Redhead (JW)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.

Jonathan Storkey (J)

Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.

Richard F Pywell (RF)

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH