A report on a survey among Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology associates regarding ionizing radiation protection practices in national interventional cath-labs.
Cardiologia de intervenção
Dosimeter
Dosímetro
Equipamentos de proteção
Intervention cardiology
Ionizing radiation
Limites de dose
Protective equipment
Radiação ionizante
Safety methods
Técnicas de minimização
Journal
Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 2174-2030
Titre abrégé: Rev Port Cardiol
Pays: Portugal
ID NLM: 8710716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Nov 2023
10 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
30
04
2023
revised:
17
07
2023
accepted:
26
07
2023
pubmed:
13
11
2023
medline:
13
11
2023
entrez:
12
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Concerns surrounding the consequences of ionizing radiation (IR) have increased in interventional cardiology (IC). Despite this, the ever-growing complexity of diseases as well as procedures can lead to greater exposure to radiation. The aim of this survey, led by Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology (APIC), was to evaluate the level of awareness and current practices on IR protection among its members. An online survey was emailed to all APIC members, between August and November 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions focusing on knowledge and measures of IR protection in the catheterization laboratory. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. From a response rate of 46.9%, the study obtained a total sample of 159 responses (156 selected for analysis). Most survey respondents (66.0%) were unaware of the radiation exposure category, and only 60.4% reported systematically using a dosimeter. A large majority (90.4%) employed techniques to minimize exposure to radiation. All participants used personal protective equipment, despite eyewear protection only being used frequently by 49.2% of main operators. Ceiling suspended shields and table protectors were often used. Only two-thirds were familiar with the legally established limit on radiation doses for workers or the dose that should trigger patient follow-up. Most of the survey respondents had a non-certified training in IR procedures and only 32.0% had attended their yearly occupational health consultation. Safety methods and protective equipment are largely adopted among interventional cardiologists, who have shown some IR awareness. Despite this, there is room for improvement, especially concerning the use of eyewear protection, monitoring, and certification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37952927
pii: S0870-2551(23)00468-7
doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.07.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
por
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.