Evaluation of imaging findings in gastrointestinal anisakiasis in emergency CT and ultrasound.

Anisakis larvae Computed tomography Gastric anisakiasis Intestinal anisakiasis Ultrasonography

Journal

Insights into imaging
ISSN: 1869-4101
Titre abrégé: Insights Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101532453

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 27 02 2023
accepted: 27 08 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
entrez: 12 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the frequency of appearance of various signs (isolated and grouped) in emergency imaging tests in patients with anisakiasis, according to the location of gastrointestinal tract involvement. Retrospective review by two experienced radiologists of emergency ultrasounds and CTs performed on patients admitted in the Emergency Department of our hospital with later confirmed anisakiasis (2010-2021), assessing the presence of signs suggesting anisakiasis. Calculation of the frequency of appearance according to the gastric or intestinal location, as well as the most common grouped signs. Out of 231 total patients with anisakiasis, imaging studies were performed in 144: abdominopelvic ultrasound in 43 cases and CT in 111 (both techniques in 31). In cases with gastric occurrence (34), in CT the wall stratification (100%), wall thickening (97%), fat stranding (91%) and ascitic fluid (82%) were predominant. In the intestinal cases (105), in CT (95) the wall thickening (100%), fat stranding (92%) and mesenteric vessel engorgement (83%) were usual; in ultrasound (40), ascitic fluid and wall thickening (70% in both cases) were frequently observed. The frequency of grouped appearance of the mentioned signs was 82% in gastric cases, 80% in intestinal cases and 50% in ultrasounds. Multisegment involvement in CT reached 28% (gastric + intestinal) and 11% (only intestinal) of cases. The most frequent CT findings in patients with gastric anisakiasis are wall stratification and thickening, fat stranding and ascitic fluid. In the intestinal cases, wall thickening, fat oedema and vessel engorgement are the most often observed findings. The presence of different radiological signs makes it advisable to include anisakiasis in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. Intestinal and multifocal involvement rates are greater than previously reported. • In gastric anisakiasis, CT frequently shows wall stratification and thickening, fat stranding and ascitic fluid. • In intestinal anisakiasis, CT often presents wall thickening, fat stranding and vessel engorgement. • In intestinal anisakiasis, ultrasounds most frequently show ascitic fluid and wall thickening.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To assess the frequency of appearance of various signs (isolated and grouped) in emergency imaging tests in patients with anisakiasis, according to the location of gastrointestinal tract involvement.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective review by two experienced radiologists of emergency ultrasounds and CTs performed on patients admitted in the Emergency Department of our hospital with later confirmed anisakiasis (2010-2021), assessing the presence of signs suggesting anisakiasis. Calculation of the frequency of appearance according to the gastric or intestinal location, as well as the most common grouped signs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 231 total patients with anisakiasis, imaging studies were performed in 144: abdominopelvic ultrasound in 43 cases and CT in 111 (both techniques in 31). In cases with gastric occurrence (34), in CT the wall stratification (100%), wall thickening (97%), fat stranding (91%) and ascitic fluid (82%) were predominant. In the intestinal cases (105), in CT (95) the wall thickening (100%), fat stranding (92%) and mesenteric vessel engorgement (83%) were usual; in ultrasound (40), ascitic fluid and wall thickening (70% in both cases) were frequently observed. The frequency of grouped appearance of the mentioned signs was 82% in gastric cases, 80% in intestinal cases and 50% in ultrasounds. Multisegment involvement in CT reached 28% (gastric + intestinal) and 11% (only intestinal) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The most frequent CT findings in patients with gastric anisakiasis are wall stratification and thickening, fat stranding and ascitic fluid. In the intestinal cases, wall thickening, fat oedema and vessel engorgement are the most often observed findings.
CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT UNASSIGNED
The presence of different radiological signs makes it advisable to include anisakiasis in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. Intestinal and multifocal involvement rates are greater than previously reported.
KEY POINTS CONCLUSIONS
• In gastric anisakiasis, CT frequently shows wall stratification and thickening, fat stranding and ascitic fluid. • In intestinal anisakiasis, CT often presents wall thickening, fat stranding and vessel engorgement. • In intestinal anisakiasis, ultrasounds most frequently show ascitic fluid and wall thickening.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37953399
doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01511-9
pii: 10.1186/s13244-023-01511-9
pmc: PMC10641062
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

187

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Allergy. 2000 Jul;55(7):627-33
pubmed: 10921461
Clin Endosc. 2013 May;46(3):293-6
pubmed: 23767043
Insights Imaging. 2014 Apr;5(2):195-208
pubmed: 24407923
Gut Liver. 2013 Jan;7(1):23-9
pubmed: 23423474
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;32(12):1485-9
pubmed: 25440233
Surg Today. 2003;33(2):123-5
pubmed: 12616375
J Clin Ultrasound. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(3):125-30
pubmed: 9502034
J Infect Dis. 1990 May;161(5):995-8
pubmed: 2324550
Clin Imaging. 2018 Jul - Aug;50:286-288
pubmed: 29738996
ACG Case Rep J. 2018 Sep 12;5:e65
pubmed: 30238019
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jun-Jul;26(6):341-6
pubmed: 12809570
Radiology. 1991 Aug;180(2):319-22
pubmed: 2068292
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(3):452-8
pubmed: 24562690
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Oct 1;51(7):806-12
pubmed: 20804423
Prog Clin Parasitol. 1993;3:43-102
pubmed: 8420604
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Sep;39(9):1703-1708
pubmed: 32154595
Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2022 May-Jun;64(3):245-255
pubmed: 35676056
Rev Clin Esp. 2005 Jul;205(7):311-5
pubmed: 16029756
J Clin Ultrasound. 2015 Jun;43(5):283-7
pubmed: 24962268
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):41-4
pubmed: 15615948
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:5176502
pubmed: 27800471
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(2):257-61
pubmed: 24441579
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar 16;10(3):69-73
pubmed: 29564036
Trends Parasitol. 2002 Jan;18(1):20-5
pubmed: 11850010

Auteurs

Roberto Fornell-Perez (R)

Radiology Department, Basurto Universitary Hospital, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain. feanim2000@yahoo.es.

Maite Urizar-Gorosarri (M)

Radiology Department, Basurto Universitary Hospital, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain.

Uxue Martinez-Urabayen (U)

Radiology Department, Basurto Universitary Hospital, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain.

Marta Perez-Bea (M)

Radiology Department, Basurto Universitary Hospital, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain.

Classifications MeSH