Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic cutoff values for benzylpenicillin in horses to support the establishment of clinical breakpoints for benzylpenicillin antimicrobial susceptibility testing in horses.

Monte Carlo simulations PK/PD cutoff antimicrobial susceptibility testing benzylpenicillin horse population pharmacokinetics probability of target attainment

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 25 08 2023
accepted: 02 10 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 13 11 2023
entrez: 13 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this international project was to establish a species-specific Clinical Breakpoint for interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of benzylpenicillin (BP) in horses. A population pharmacokinetic model of BP disposition was developed to compute PK/PD cutoff values of BP for different formulations that are commonly used in equine medicine around the world (France, Sweden, USA and Japan). Investigated substances were potassium BP, sodium BP, procaine BP, a combination of procaine BP and benzathine BP and penethamate, a prodrug of BP. Data were collected from 40 horses that provided 63 rich profiles of BP corresponding to a total of 1022 individual BP plasma concentrations. A 3-compartment disposition model was selected. For each of these formulations, the PK/PD cutoff was estimated for different dosage regimens using Monte Carlo simulations. The The PK/PD cutoff of 0.25 mg/L is one dilution lower than the clinical breakpoint released by the CLSI (0.5 mg/ L). From our simulations, the CLSI clinical breakpoint can be achieved with IM procaine BP twice a day at 22,000 IU i.e. 12.4 mg/kg.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37954237
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1282949
pmc: PMC10634207
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1282949

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Lallemand, Bousquet-Mélou, Chapuis, Davis, Ferran, Kukanich, Kuroda, Lacroix, Minamijima, Olsén, Pelligand, Portugal, Roques, Santschi, Wilson and Toutain.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Res Vet Sci. 1976 Jan;20(1):24-9
pubmed: 1257624
Res Vet Sci. 2013 Aug;95(1):212-8
pubmed: 23419937
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 May;12(5):681-689
pubmed: 37025064
Vet Surg. 2023 Jan;52(1):87-97
pubmed: 36286077
Equine Vet J. 2021 Nov;53(6):1239-1249
pubmed: 33341979
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;44(2):172-200
pubmed: 33089523
Am J Vet Res. 2014 Feb;75(2):124-31
pubmed: 24471748
Aust Vet J. 1988 Jun;65(6):181-5
pubmed: 3415617
Am J Vet Res. 1986 Nov;47(11):2380-4
pubmed: 3789498
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar;42(2):239-242
pubmed: 30387161
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;20(2):105-10
pubmed: 9131536
Br Vet J. 1995 Jul-Aug;151(4):401-12
pubmed: 7552196
Equine Vet J. 1983 Jan;15(1):43-8
pubmed: 6825648
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Dec;60(6):1185-8
pubmed: 17932075
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;44(2):270-279
pubmed: 33650183
Vet Rec. 2014 Oct 4;175(13):325
pubmed: 24899065
Vet J. 2017 Oct;228:33-37
pubmed: 29153105
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;30(3):201-7
pubmed: 17472651
Equine Vet J. 2013 Mar;45(2):141-7
pubmed: 22994559
Equine Vet J. 2012 May;44(3):289-96
pubmed: 21848534
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008 Feb;35(1):101-16
pubmed: 17963024
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 15;8:2344
pubmed: 29326661
Am J Vet Res. 1994 Jun;55(6):825-30
pubmed: 7944023
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1310
pubmed: 31244816
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Apr;104(4):1230-9
pubmed: 25641543
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Oct;55(10):4619-30
pubmed: 21807983
Br J Sports Med. 1976 Oct;10(3):109-16
pubmed: 1000155
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jan 27;64(2):
pubmed: 31767718
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Sep;42(3):283-90
pubmed: 8877017

Auteurs

Elodie A Lallemand (EA)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Alain Bousquet-Mélou (A)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Laura Chapuis (L)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Jennifer Davis (J)

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.

Aude A Ferran (AA)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Butch Kukanich (B)

Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.

Taisuke Kuroda (T)

Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.

Marlène Z Lacroix (MZ)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Yohei Minamijima (Y)

Drug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.

Lena Olsén (L)

Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Ludovic Pelligand (L)

Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Felipe Ramon Portugal (FR)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Béatrice B Roques (BB)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Elizabeth M Santschi (EM)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.

Katherine E Wilson (KE)

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, United States.

Pierre-Louis Toutain (PL)

INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH