Randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of self-expanding bare metal nitinol stent and balloon angioplasty alone for below-the-knee lesions following successful balloon angioplasty: 1-year clinical outcomes.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
12
08
2023
accepted:
23
10
2023
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
13
11
2023
entrez:
13
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This prospective, multicenter, randomized study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical outcomes after primary stenting with self-expanding bare metal nitinol stent (SENS) and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and below-the-knee (BTK) lesions. Overall, 119 patients with CLI and BTK lesions were randomized to POBA alone (POBA group, 61 patients) or primary stenting with SENS (stenting group, 58 patients) after achieving acceptable POBA results in target BTK lesions. Clinical outcomes including amputation and revascularization rates were prospectively compared for 1 year. After 1 year, similar incidence rates of individual clinical endpoints, including cardiac death (6.5% vs. 5.1%, p > 0.999), myocardial infarction (1.6% vs. 0.0%, p > 0.999), repeat revascularization (19.6% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.922), target lesion revascularization (13.1% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.530), and amputation (4.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.244), were observed. POBA appeared to have acceptable treatment outcomes compared with primary stenting with SENS after 1 year in CLI patients with BTK lesions undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37956128
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294132
pii: PONE-D-23-24607
pmc: PMC10642822
doi:
Substances chimiques
nitinol
2EWL73IJ7F
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0294132Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Ahn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Oct;22(5):690-7
pubmed: 26245919
Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):292-301
pubmed: 12955452
J R Soc Med. 2017 Mar;110(3):104-109
pubmed: 28116957
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):742-751; discussion 751
pubmed: 16616230
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):975-981
pubmed: 18372148
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;31(4):378-88
pubmed: 25435665
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 16;9(10):
pubmed: 33081117
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun 1;3(3):267-76
pubmed: 20484101
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):356-61
pubmed: 20541349
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67
pubmed: 17223489
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 08;12:CD009195
pubmed: 30536919
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):634-42
pubmed: 22012905
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):1021-31
pubmed: 10997465
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec 1;76(7):1047-54
pubmed: 20518006
Can J Cardiol. 2022 May;38(5):560-587
pubmed: 35537813
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;18(6):703-8
pubmed: 17538131
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Oct;57(5):653-66
pubmed: 27177357
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Apr 4;16(1):41
pubmed: 28376797
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;26(4):319-24
pubmed: 23795656
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jun;43(6):1183-90
pubmed: 16765235
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Aug;48(4):455-61
pubmed: 17653005
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):220-34.e1-2
pubmed: 24126108
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 4;354(18):1879-88
pubmed: 16672699
Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34
pubmed: 16325694
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):37-42
pubmed: 20462719
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 15;80(6):1042-51
pubmed: 22605682
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb;45(2):304-10; discussion 310-1
pubmed: 17264008
Trials. 2017 Dec 14;18(1):594
pubmed: 29237489
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0251755
pubmed: 34111147