A Comparison of the Effects of Phonation into a Positive Expiratory Pressure Device and Silicone Tube in Water on the Vocal Mechanism.

Acapella Periodogram Positive expiratory pressure Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises Shaker Tube phonation Vocal tract impedance Water resistance therapy

Journal

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation
ISSN: 1873-4588
Titre abrégé: J Voice
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8712262

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2023
revised: 13 10 2023
accepted: 13 10 2023
medline: 14 11 2023
pubmed: 14 11 2023
entrez: 13 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices have become an additional therapeutic approach for treating voice disorders. Similar to water resistance therapy (WRT), phonation in a PEP device introduces a secondary source of vibration within the vocal tract. This investigation aimed to compare the effects of phonation using a PEP device and silicone tube phonation (STP) commonly used in WRT on the vocal mechanism during phonation. Three normophonic subjects participated in the study. High-speed videoendoscopy, pressure, airflow, electroglottography, and acoustic recordings were collected. The results demonstrated that phonation using both the PEP device and silicone tube induced alterations in glottal behavior. The PEP device produced more pronounced and consistent pressure oscillations, impacting the glottal cycle and influencing parameters including contact quotient (CQ), fundamental frequency, glottal area, pressure, and airflow. The regular vibratory mechanism of the PEP device systematically modified the glottal cycle. In STP, regular bubbling at lower depths of submersion produced higher CQ values, supporting the efficacy of deep bubbling exercises for inducing glottal adduction. The findings suggest that phonation using PEP devices has a more pronounced impact on the vocal tract and glottis. It also provides a stronger massage effect that directly affects the glottal source. Phonation with a silicone tube produces similar results, although to a lesser extent and with lower regularity. These findings offer guidance in the selection of voice therapy devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37957073
pii: S0892-1997(23)00331-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.10.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Pedro Amarante Andrade (P)

Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Australia; Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: pedro.andrade@curtin.edu.au.

Marek Frič (M)

Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia.

Brian Saccente-Kennedy (B)

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Viktor Hruška (V)

Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia.

Classifications MeSH