MiRNome variations in milk fractions during feed restrictions of different intensities in dairy cows.
Dairy cows
Feed restriction
Milk fractions
miRNome
microRNA
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Nov 2023
13 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
14
06
2023
accepted:
26
10
2023
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
14
11
2023
entrez:
14
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In dairy cows, diet is one factor that can affect their milk production and composition. However, the effect of feed restriction on milk miRNome has not yet been described. Indeed, milk is the body fluid with the highest RNA concentration, which includes numerous microRNA. Its presence in the four different milk fractions, whole milk, fat globules, mammary epithelial cells and extracellular vesicles, is still poorly documented. This study aimed to describe the effects of different feed restrictions on the miRNome composition of different milk fractions. Two feed restrictions were applied to lactating dairy cows, one of high intensity and one of moderate intensity. 2,896 mature microRNA were identified in the different milk fractions studied, including 1,493 that were already known in the bovine species. Among the 1,096 microRNA that were sufficiently abundant to be informative, the abundance of 1,027 of them varied between fractions: 36 of those were exclusive to one milk fraction. Feed restriction affected the abundance of 155 microRNA, with whole milk and milk extracellular vesicles being the most affected, whereas milk fat globules and exfoliated mammary epithelial cells were little or not affected at all. The high intensity feed restriction led to more microRNA variations in milk than moderate restriction. The target prediction of known microRNA that varied under feed restriction suggested the modification of some key pathways for lactation related to milk fat and protein metabolisms, cell cycle, and stress responses. This study highlighted that the miRNome of each milk fraction is specific, with mostly the same microRNA composition but with variations in abundance between fractions. These specific miRNomes were affected differently by feed restrictions, the intensity of which appeared to be a major factor modulating milk miRNomes. These findings offer opportunities for future research on the use of milk miRNA as biomarkers of energy status in dairy cows, which is affected by feed restrictions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In dairy cows, diet is one factor that can affect their milk production and composition. However, the effect of feed restriction on milk miRNome has not yet been described. Indeed, milk is the body fluid with the highest RNA concentration, which includes numerous microRNA. Its presence in the four different milk fractions, whole milk, fat globules, mammary epithelial cells and extracellular vesicles, is still poorly documented. This study aimed to describe the effects of different feed restrictions on the miRNome composition of different milk fractions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two feed restrictions were applied to lactating dairy cows, one of high intensity and one of moderate intensity. 2,896 mature microRNA were identified in the different milk fractions studied, including 1,493 that were already known in the bovine species. Among the 1,096 microRNA that were sufficiently abundant to be informative, the abundance of 1,027 of them varied between fractions: 36 of those were exclusive to one milk fraction. Feed restriction affected the abundance of 155 microRNA, with whole milk and milk extracellular vesicles being the most affected, whereas milk fat globules and exfoliated mammary epithelial cells were little or not affected at all. The high intensity feed restriction led to more microRNA variations in milk than moderate restriction. The target prediction of known microRNA that varied under feed restriction suggested the modification of some key pathways for lactation related to milk fat and protein metabolisms, cell cycle, and stress responses.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlighted that the miRNome of each milk fraction is specific, with mostly the same microRNA composition but with variations in abundance between fractions. These specific miRNomes were affected differently by feed restrictions, the intensity of which appeared to be a major factor modulating milk miRNomes. These findings offer opportunities for future research on the use of milk miRNA as biomarkers of energy status in dairy cows, which is affected by feed restrictions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37957547
doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09769-5
pii: 10.1186/s12864-023-09769-5
pmc: PMC10641998
doi:
Substances chimiques
MicroRNAs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
680Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W460-6
pubmed: 25977294
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Jul;234(7):10101-10110
pubmed: 30422318
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 20;7:44605
pubmed: 28317898
Reprod Domest Anim. 2020 May;55(5):613-623
pubmed: 32083783
J Extracell Vesicles. 2017 Mar 7;6(1):1286095
pubmed: 28326170
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 24;12(1):5131
pubmed: 35332227
BMC Genomics. 2014 Mar 07;15:181
pubmed: 24606609
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 May;18(3):703-722
pubmed: 33336926
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177182
pubmed: 28520748
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Oct;61(10):
pubmed: 28643865
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Oct;47(10):8259-8264
pubmed: 32909217
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jul 30;20(1):621
pubmed: 31362707
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 04;10(3):e0118284
pubmed: 25738494
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018 Jul;23(4):663-672
pubmed: 29383581
Clin Chem. 2010 Nov;56(11):1733-41
pubmed: 20847327
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D239-D245
pubmed: 29156006
Methods. 2020 May 1;177:15-26
pubmed: 31978536
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):9824-9834
pubmed: 28987579
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20345
pubmed: 31889100
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(1):37-52
pubmed: 21911355
Front Genet. 2015 Oct 28;6:323
pubmed: 26579195
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2670-2685
pubmed: 30639009
J Dairy Sci. 2015 May;98(5):2920-33
pubmed: 25726110
J Anim Sci Technol. 2021 May;63(3):593-602
pubmed: 34189507
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0248680
pubmed: 33857151
Bioinformatics. 2013 Sep 1;29(17):2146-52
pubmed: 23821648
J Extracell Vesicles. 2017 Nov 21;6(1):1401897
pubmed: 29904572
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jul;100(7):5837-5849
pubmed: 28527797
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154129
pubmed: 27100870
J Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;99(7):
pubmed: 34196701
BMC Dev Biol. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):12
pubmed: 34454436
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3133-3146
pubmed: 32059860
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18886
pubmed: 36344510
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140111
pubmed: 26473604
Sci Data. 2023 Jul 19;10(1):465
pubmed: 37468505
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Jun 18;9:48
pubmed: 29946461
Cells. 2020 Jan 23;9(2):
pubmed: 31979244
Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019:
pubmed: 31608376
Proteomes. 2020 May 13;8(2):
pubmed: 32414045
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4623-35
pubmed: 21854935
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D140-4
pubmed: 16381832
Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116(2):281-97
pubmed: 14744438