Artificial Intelligence ECG Analysis in Patients with Short QT Syndrome to Predict Life-Threatening Arrhythmic Events.
artificial intelligence
deep learning
electrocardiogram
risk stratification
shallow learning
short QT syndrome
sudden cardiac death
vision transformers
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2023
01 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
17
07
2023
revised:
23
10
2023
accepted:
28
10
2023
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
14
11
2023
entrez:
14
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Short QT syndrome (SQTS) is an inherited cardiac ion-channel disease related to an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young and otherwise healthy individuals. SCD is often the first clinical presentation in patients with SQTS. However, arrhythmia risk stratification is presently unsatisfactory in asymptomatic patients. In this context, artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis has never been applied to refine risk stratification in patients with SQTS. The purpose of this study was to analyze ECGs from SQTS patients with the aid of different AI algorithms to evaluate their ability to discriminate between subjects with and without documented life-threatening arrhythmic events. The study group included 104 SQTS patients, 37 of whom had a documented major arrhythmic event at presentation and/or during follow-up. Thirteen ECG features were measured independently by three expert cardiologists; then, the dataset was randomly divided into three subsets (training, validation, and testing). Five shallow neural networks were trained, validated, and tested to predict subject-specific class (non-event/event) using different subsets of ECG features. Additionally, several deep learning and machine learning algorithms, such as Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, MobileNetV3, EfficientNetV2, ConvNextTiny, Capsule Networks, and logistic regression were trained, validated, and tested directly on the scanned ECG images, without any manual feature extraction. Furthermore, a shallow neural network, a 1-D transformer classifier, and a 1-D CNN were trained, validated, and tested on ECG signals extracted from the aforementioned scanned images. Classification metrics were evaluated by means of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and area under the curve. Results prove that artificial intelligence can help clinicians in better stratifying risk of arrhythmia in patients with SQTS. In particular, shallow neural networks' processing features showed the best performance in identifying patients that will not suffer from a potentially lethal event. This could pave the way for refined ECG-based risk stratification in this group of patients, potentially helping in saving the lives of young and otherwise healthy individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37960599
pii: s23218900
doi: 10.3390/s23218900
pmc: PMC10649184
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation
ID : MAE01668482021-11-16
Organisme : Italian Ministry of University and Research
ID : 32-G-13427-2
Références
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Oct;120:102165
pubmed: 34629153
Artif Intell Med. 2006 Nov;38(3):305-18
pubmed: 16962295
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Jul;117:102113
pubmed: 34127242
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):70-74
pubmed: 30617318
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Jul;18(7):465-478
pubmed: 33526938
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 21;43(8):1494-9
pubmed: 15093889
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014 Aug;3(2):76-9
pubmed: 26835070
Circ Res. 2005 Apr 15;96(7):800-7
pubmed: 15761194
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014 Aug;10(3):287-94
pubmed: 24827793
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2015 Jul;14(5):505-12
pubmed: 25915962
Circulation. 2003 Aug 26;108(8):965-70
pubmed: 12925462
Circulation. 2004 May 25;109(20):2394-7
pubmed: 15159330
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105639
pubmed: 32674047
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2008 Feb;30(2):243-52
pubmed: 18084056
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):533-4
pubmed: 27483067
J Nephrol. 2021 Dec;34(6):1875-1886
pubmed: 33900581
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Aug;207:106191
pubmed: 34077866
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019 May 1;348:313-333
pubmed: 32863454
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Feb;6(2):267-71
pubmed: 19187923
Artif Intell Med. 2008 Sep;44(1):51-64
pubmed: 18585905
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Dec;14(12):1273-7
pubmed: 14678099
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;22(19):
pubmed: 36236237
Cardiology. 2000;94(2):99-102
pubmed: 11173780
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct;4(19):370
pubmed: 27826573
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2793-2867
pubmed: 26320108
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 8;63(13):1300-1308
pubmed: 24291113
Circulation. 2004 Jan 6;109(1):30-5
pubmed: 14676148
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56
pubmed: 30617339
Eur Heart J. 2022 Apr 14;43(15):1500-1510
pubmed: 34557911
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 25;20(8):
pubmed: 31027180
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):861-867
pubmed: 31378392
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 May;203:106006
pubmed: 33735660
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 2;58(6):587-95
pubmed: 21798421
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Oct;108(10):1140-1146
pubmed: 30879093
Cognit Comput. 2022;14(5):1689-1710
pubmed: 34466163
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jun;11(6):1024-30
pubmed: 24589867
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 May;203:106035
pubmed: 33770545
Circulation. 2008 May 6;117(18):2395-9
pubmed: 18458181
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):428-436
pubmed: 30942845
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126
pubmed: 36017572
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;12(9):e007284
pubmed: 31450977