Chemotherapy and adjuvant therapies' impact on the internal remodeling process of bone and its mechanical behavior for breast cancer patients.
bone
bone density
breast cancer
finite element modeling
mechanobiology
Journal
International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
ISSN: 2040-7947
Titre abrégé: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101530293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Nov 2023
13 Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
17
08
2023
received:
11
04
2023
accepted:
01
10
2023
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
14
11
2023
entrez:
14
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Breast cancer is a significant public health issue affecting women worldwide. While advancements in treatment options have led to improved survival rates, the impact of breast cancer and its treatments on bone health cannot be overlooked. Bone remodeling is a complex process regulated by the delicate balance between bone formation and resorption. Any disruption to this balance can lead to decreased bone density, increased fracture risk, and compromised physical function. To investigate the effects of breast cancer and its treatments on bone remodeling, a finite element model was developed in this study. This model incorporated bone remodeling equations to simulate the mechanical behavior of bone under different conditions. The ABAQUS/UMAT software was used to simulate the behavior of bone tissue under the influence of breast cancer and treatments. Our findings suggest that bone loss is more pronounced after secondary breast cancer and treatment, leading to bone loss (6%-19% decrease in BV/TV), reduced bone stimulation, and decreased effectiveness of physical activity on recovery. These results highlight the importance of early intervention and management of bone health in breast cancer patients to mitigate the negative impact of cancer and treatment on bone remodeling.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3788Subventions
Organisme : Partenariat Hubert Curien Franco-Moroccan TOUBKAL
ID : TBK/20/102
Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, Chabrand P. Toward a mathematical modeling of diseases' impact on bone remodeling: technical review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:1236. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.584198
Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, Chabrand P. Mechanobiological behavior of a pathological bone. Biomechanics and Functional Tissue Engineering. Intechopen; 2021. doi:10.5772/intechopen.97029
Kalder M, Hadji P. Breast cancer and osteoporosis-management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Breast Care. 2014;9(5):312. doi:10.1159/000368843
Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, Chabrand P, et al. Experimental-based mechanobiological modeling of the anabolic and catabolic effects of breast cancer on bone remodeling. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022;21:1841-1856. doi:10.1007/S10237-022-01623-Z
Barkaoui A, Ait Oumghar I, Ben Kahla R. Review on the use of medical imaging in orthopedic biomechanics: finite element studies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2021;9(5):535-554. doi:10.1080/21681163.2021.1888317
Hambli R, Boughattas MH, Daniel JL, Kourta A. Prediction of denosumab effects on bone remodeling: A combined pharmacokinetics and finite element modeling. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.010
Bolognese MA, Teglbjaerg CS, Zanchetta JR, et al. Denosumab significantly increases DXA BMD at both trabecular and cortical sites: results from the FREEDOM study. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16(2):147-153. doi:10.1016/J.JOCD.2012.02.006
Cummings SR, Martin JS, McClung MR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756-765. doi:10.1056/NEJMOA0809493
McClung MR, Zanchetta JR, Høiseth A, et al. Denosumab densitometric changes assessed by quantitative computed tomography at the spine and hip in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16(2):250-256. doi:10.1016/J.JOCD.2012.02.014
Ashrafi M, Gubaua JE, Pereira JT, Gahlichi F, Doblaré M. A mechano-chemo-biological model for bone remodeling with a new mechano-chemo-transduction approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020;19(6):2499-2523. doi:10.1007/s10237-020-01353-0
Ait Oumghar I, Barkaoui A, EL Ghazi A, Chabrand P. Modeling and simulation of bone cells dynamic behavior under the late effect of breast cancer treatments. Med Eng Phys. 2023;115(July 2022):103982. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.103982
Lev MH, Gonzalez RG. 17-CT Angiography and CT perfusion imaging. In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, eds. Brain mapping: the methods. Second ed.), Academic Press; 2002:427-484. doi:10.1016/B978-012693019-1/50019-8
Sternheim A, Giladi O, Gortzak Y, et al. Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study, Bone. 2018;110:215-220.
Polgar K., Viceconti M., & O’Connor J J. A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2001;215(1), 85-94. doi:10.1243/0954411011533562
Ramos A, Simões JA, Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2006;28(9):916-924. doi:10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2005.12.006
Tadepalli SC, Erdemir A, Cavanagh PR. Comparison of hexahedral and tetrahedral elements in finite element analysis of the foot and footwear. Journal of Biomechanics. 2011;44(12):2337-2343. doi:10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2011.05.006
Ben Kahla R, Barkaoui A, Merzouki T. Age-related mechanical strength evolution of trabecular bone under fatigue damage for both genders: fracture risk evaluation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;84:64-73. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.006
Barkaoui A, RB KAHLA, Merzouki T, Hambli R. Numerical simulation of apparent density evolution of trabecular bone under fatigue loading: Effect of bone initial properties. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 2019;19(5). doi:10.1142/S0219519419500416
Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA. Skeletal tissue mechanics. Vol 190. Springer; 1998.
Barkaoui A, Ben Kahla R, Merzouki T, Hambli R. Age and gender effects on bone mass density variation: finite elements simulation. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2017;16(2). doi:10.1007/s10237-016-0834-x
Hernandez CJ, Beaupré GS, Keller TS, Carter DR. The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone. 2001;29(1):74-78. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00467-7
Scheiner S, Pivonka P, Hellmich C. Coupling systems biology with multiscale mechanics, for computer simulations of bone remodeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2013;254:181-196. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.015
Fraenkel M, Novack V, Mizrakli Y, et al. Bone mineral density in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022;8(1):21. doi:10.1038/S41523-022-00388-Z
Nazarian A, Von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Müller R, Snyder BD. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008;83(6):368-379. doi:10.1007/S00223-008-9174-X
Kundaktepe BP, Sozer V, Kundaktepe FO, et al. Association between bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in breast cancer patients and bone-only metastasis. Medicina (Lithuania). 2021;57(9):880. doi:10.3390/medicina57090880
Bouvard B, Confavreux CB, Briot K, et al. French recommendations on strategies for preventing and treating osteoporosis induced by adjuvant breast cancer therapies. Joint Bone Spine. 2019;86:542-553. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2019.07.005
Eastell R, Adams JE, Coleman RE, et al. Effect of anastrozole on bone mineral density: 5-year results from the anastrozole, tamoxifen, alone or in combination trial 18233230. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1051-1057. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0726
Perez EA, Serene M, Durling FC, Weilbaecher K. Aromatase inhibitors and bone loss. Oncology. 2006;20(9):1029-1039.
Bailey S, Stadelmann MA, Zysset PK, Vashishth D, Alkalay RN. Influence of metastatic bone lesion type and tumor origin on human vertebral bone architecture, matrix quality, and mechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37(5):896-907. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4539
Kaneko TS, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Keyak JH. Relationships between material properties and CT scan data of cortical bone with and without metastatic lesions. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25(6):445-454. doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00030-4
Cameron DA, Douglas S, Brown JE, Anderson RA. Bone mineral density loss during adjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer: is it dependent on oestrogen deficiency? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):805-814. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0899-7
Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith DW, et al. Model structure and control of bone remodeling: a theoretical study. Bone. 2008;43:249-263. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.025
Buenzli P, Pivonka P, Gardiner B, Smith D. Modelling the anabolic response of bone using a cell population model. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2012;307:42-52. doi:10.1016/J.JTBI.2012.04.019