Should a Narrow Corridor Be a Contraindication for Performing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure or Not?

extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion oblique corridor oblique lateral oblique surgical corridor

Journal

Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 14 11 2023
pubmed: 14 11 2023
entrez: 14 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Retrospective study. We investigated the effect of corridor width on the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent the OLIF procedure. Patients who underwent OLIF surgery, which included L4-5, between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into three groups by the width of the corridor: not more than 10 mm, between 10 and 20 mm, and 20 mm or more. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications between these groups. A total of 81 patients were included. There were no significant differences in VAS leg and back pain scores, ODI scores, or complications between each group. The radiographic findings, including cage position, anterior and posterior disc height, segmental Cobb angle, and foraminal height, also showed no significant differences between each group. The only radiographic finding that showed a significant difference between each group was the angle of the cage. We found significantly less degree of angle in the wider than 20 mm group when compared to the other two groups. ( The width of oblique corridor does not affect clinical outcomes, complications, or radiographic findings, including position of the cage, anterior and posterior disc height, segmental angle, and foraminal height after OLIF procedure, including L4-5 level. Thus, the OLIF procedure can be performed safely even in patients with limited oblique corridors, especially at L4-5.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37962023
doi: 10.1177/21925682231216049
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21925682231216049

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Weerasak Singhatanadgige (W)

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Panupong Chatareeyagul (P)

Department of Orthopedics, Luangpor Taweesak Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Teerachat Tanasansomboon (T)

Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Phanupong Phutrakool (P)

Chula Data Management Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Vit Kotheeranurak (V)

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Wicharn Yingsakmongkol (W)

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Worawat Limthongkul (W)

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH