Cancer-Related Financial Hardship Screening as Part of Practice Transformation.


Journal

Medical care
ISSN: 1537-1948
Titre abrégé: Med Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0230027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2023
Historique:
medline: 16 11 2023
pubmed: 14 11 2023
entrez: 14 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Data on financial hardship, an "adverse event" in individuals with cancer, are needed to inform policy and supportive care interventions and reduce adverse economic outcomes. Lay navigator-led financial hardship screening was piloted among University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology patients initiating treatment in October 2020. Financial hardship screening, including reported financial distress and difficulty, was added to a standard-of-care treatment planning survey. Screening feasibility and completion and proportions of reported financial distress and difficulty were calculated overall and by patient race and rurality. The risk of financial distress by patient sociodemographics was estimated. Patients who completed a treatment planning survey (N=2741) were 18% Black, Indigenous, or persons of color (BIPOC) and 16% rural dwelling. The majority of patients completed financial hardship screening (90%), surpassing the target feasibility completion rate of 75%. The screening revealed 34% of patients were experiencing financial distress, including 49% of BIPOC and 30% of White patients. Adjusted models revealed BIPOC patients had a 48% higher risk of financial distress compared with those who were White (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.31-1.66). Large differences in reported financial difficulties were seen comparing patients who were BIPOC and White (utilities: 33% vs. 10%, upfront medical payments: 44% vs. 23%, transportation: 28% vs. 12%, respectively). The collection of patient-reported financial hardship data via routine clinical care was feasible and identified racial inequities at treatment initiation. Efforts to collect patient economic data should support the design, implementation, and evaluation of patient-centered interventions to improve equity and reduce the impact of financial hardship.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Data on financial hardship, an "adverse event" in individuals with cancer, are needed to inform policy and supportive care interventions and reduce adverse economic outcomes.
METHODS
Lay navigator-led financial hardship screening was piloted among University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology patients initiating treatment in October 2020. Financial hardship screening, including reported financial distress and difficulty, was added to a standard-of-care treatment planning survey. Screening feasibility and completion and proportions of reported financial distress and difficulty were calculated overall and by patient race and rurality. The risk of financial distress by patient sociodemographics was estimated.
RESULTS
Patients who completed a treatment planning survey (N=2741) were 18% Black, Indigenous, or persons of color (BIPOC) and 16% rural dwelling. The majority of patients completed financial hardship screening (90%), surpassing the target feasibility completion rate of 75%. The screening revealed 34% of patients were experiencing financial distress, including 49% of BIPOC and 30% of White patients. Adjusted models revealed BIPOC patients had a 48% higher risk of financial distress compared with those who were White (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.31-1.66). Large differences in reported financial difficulties were seen comparing patients who were BIPOC and White (utilities: 33% vs. 10%, upfront medical payments: 44% vs. 23%, transportation: 28% vs. 12%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The collection of patient-reported financial hardship data via routine clinical care was feasible and identified racial inequities at treatment initiation. Efforts to collect patient economic data should support the design, implementation, and evaluation of patient-centered interventions to improve equity and reduce the impact of financial hardship.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37963030
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001910
pii: 00005650-202312001-00008
pmc: PMC10635335
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S116-S121

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

G.B.R. is supported by an American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant (MRSG-17-051-01-PCSM) and has received research funding from Genentech, Pfizer, and Carevive and consulting fees from Genentech and Pfizer, all unrelated to this work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105881
pubmed: 31727380
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Feb;18(2):e271-e283
pubmed: 34752150
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;38(4):302-309
pubmed: 31804857
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1935-1945
pubmed: 31184952
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Mar;71(2):100-106
pubmed: 33226648
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Aug 1;6(8):1295-1297
pubmed: 32672809
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Aug;18(8):e1234-e1246
pubmed: 35947881
Am J Med. 2018 Oct;131(10):1187-1199.e5
pubmed: 29906429
Evid Based Med. 2013 Feb;18(1):5-10
pubmed: 22740357
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 20;109(2):
pubmed: 27754926
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Feb;156(2):271-277
pubmed: 31771866
Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Feb;27(2):80-1, 149
pubmed: 23530397
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1670-1682
pubmed: 34698839
Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484
pubmed: 27716900
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 11;108(5):
pubmed: 26657334
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Jul;18(7):825-831
pubmed: 32634772
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Aug;13(8):512-514
pubmed: 28613969
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Mar;15(3):e271-e276
pubmed: 30702963
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4779-4786
pubmed: 30972645
Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;120(20):3245-53
pubmed: 24954526
Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Apr;27(4):253-4, 256
pubmed: 23781687
J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Dec;5(4):395-404
pubmed: 21800053
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):e731-e739
pubmed: 34995081
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):429-437
pubmed: 31144264
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jul;28(7):1202-1211
pubmed: 31061097

Auteurs

Courtney P Williams (CP)

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Margaret I Liang (MI)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.

Gabrielle B Rocque (GB)

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Risha Gidwani (R)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Nicole E Caston (NE)

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Maria Pisu (M)

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH