"It's starting to weigh on me": Exploring the Experiences and Support Needs of Harm Reduction Staff in Connecticut using the Social-Ecological Model.
Burnout
Harm reduction
Mental health
Qualitative
Staffing
Journal
Harm reduction journal
ISSN: 1477-7517
Titre abrégé: Harm Reduct J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153624
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 11 2023
14 11 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
15
11
2023
entrez:
14
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The experiences and perceived support needs of harm reduction workers in the USA have been understudied. While previous research has explored staff burnout and role-related stress, there is a research gap around potential supports for staff wellbeing and individual longevity in their roles. This is especially critical given the growing overdose crisis and the need for sustainable harm reduction programming. Thus, we sought to describe the experiences of harm reduction staff and identify the perceived support that could empower harm reduction staff to successfully navigate their roles. Purposive sampling methods were used to recruit harm reduction staff working in Connecticut. Seventeen semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted between December 2022 and March 2023. Participants were asked about their experiences with role-related stressors and supports. Informed by the Social-Ecological Model, transcripts were coded using both inductive and deductive codes, and themes were developed using thematic analysis approaches. Study participants described their experiences working in harm reduction and the numerous ways they already are or could be receiving support in their roles. These experiences were organized into eight themes according to the levels of the Social-Ecological Model. At the individual level, participants explained that support could help them navigate the variability of the physical environment, boundary setting, and self-care. Relationships between clients and co-workers were both identified as means of support at the interpersonal level, helping participants navigate difficult situations and feelings of stress. At the organizational level, study participants explained how they look to their organization to provide sufficient support by way of training, staffing, compensation, and benefits. Additionally, participants stressed the importance of having supervisors who valued their work and provided emotional support. Lastly, at the community level, participants discussed how support was needed to help them navigate complex systems while working with a stigmatized population in an often-stigmatized field. To best support harm reduction staff in their day-to-day roles, our findings underscore the need for support on multiple levels. Future research could explore how the provision of support to harm reduction staff impacts not only staff perceptions of support but also the success of clients accessing harm reduction services.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The experiences and perceived support needs of harm reduction workers in the USA have been understudied. While previous research has explored staff burnout and role-related stress, there is a research gap around potential supports for staff wellbeing and individual longevity in their roles. This is especially critical given the growing overdose crisis and the need for sustainable harm reduction programming. Thus, we sought to describe the experiences of harm reduction staff and identify the perceived support that could empower harm reduction staff to successfully navigate their roles.
METHODS
Purposive sampling methods were used to recruit harm reduction staff working in Connecticut. Seventeen semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted between December 2022 and March 2023. Participants were asked about their experiences with role-related stressors and supports. Informed by the Social-Ecological Model, transcripts were coded using both inductive and deductive codes, and themes were developed using thematic analysis approaches.
RESULTS
Study participants described their experiences working in harm reduction and the numerous ways they already are or could be receiving support in their roles. These experiences were organized into eight themes according to the levels of the Social-Ecological Model. At the individual level, participants explained that support could help them navigate the variability of the physical environment, boundary setting, and self-care. Relationships between clients and co-workers were both identified as means of support at the interpersonal level, helping participants navigate difficult situations and feelings of stress. At the organizational level, study participants explained how they look to their organization to provide sufficient support by way of training, staffing, compensation, and benefits. Additionally, participants stressed the importance of having supervisors who valued their work and provided emotional support. Lastly, at the community level, participants discussed how support was needed to help them navigate complex systems while working with a stigmatized population in an often-stigmatized field.
CONCLUSIONS
To best support harm reduction staff in their day-to-day roles, our findings underscore the need for support on multiple levels. Future research could explore how the provision of support to harm reduction staff impacts not only staff perceptions of support but also the success of clients accessing harm reduction services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37964261
doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00898-4
pii: 10.1186/s12954-023-00898-4
pmc: PMC10644636
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;78(6):759-772
pubmed: 34353655
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107620
pubmed: 31675545
Biosocieties. 2017 Jun;12(2):217-238
pubmed: 28690668
Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77
pubmed: 3068205
Transl Res. 2021 Aug;234:159-173
pubmed: 33746108
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Mar 06;18(1):15
pubmed: 36879304
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Nov;85:102922
pubmed: 32911320
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251860
pubmed: 34010338
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Oct;120:104182
pubmed: 37683570
AIDS Behav. 2022 Jan;26(1):57-68
pubmed: 34110506
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:103076
pubmed: 33321286
AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2466-2468
pubmed: 32333209
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Feb 16;18(1):19
pubmed: 33593364
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;225:60-68
pubmed: 30798157
Harm Reduct J. 2013 Apr 01;10:5
pubmed: 23548032
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):12-20
pubmed: 30073598
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jul 15;19(1):78
pubmed: 35841101
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608
pubmed: 27670770
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):282-98
pubmed: 10159709
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:73-77
pubmed: 29481827
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113631
pubmed: 33418149
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 May;26(5):492-500
pubmed: 25630481
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:135-140
pubmed: 31654936
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Feb 11;18(1):18
pubmed: 33573661
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:103015
pubmed: 33176249
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;19(2):137-55
pubmed: 17464792
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107555
pubmed: 31542630
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:127-135
pubmed: 31590088