Development of the National Policy for Quality in Healthcare for Malaysia.


Journal

Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 26 06 2023
accepted: 14 10 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 15 11 2023
entrez: 15 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Quality in healthcare is a fundamental pillar of health systems performance, leading to improved health outcomes and reduced waste. The World Health Organization recommends that countries establish a national quality policy and strategy (NQPS) to steer the provision of safe and high-performing healthcare services and foster a quality culture. This paper describes the development process and key content of Malaysia's new 5-year National Policy for Quality in Healthcare. The development process was managed by a technical working group led by the Institute for Health Systems Research in the Ministry of Health. Situational analysis was conducted through a multi-pronged approach, underpinned by a review of the past and present healthcare sectoral and quality plans and guided by the WHO NQPS framework. This approach involved: (i) review of quality-related policy documents, (ii) online surveys of healthcare providers and the public, (iii) key-informant facilitated discussions and (iv) mapping of existing quality improvement initiatives (QIIs). Data gathered from these approaches informed the content of the new policy. Following thematic analysis, the findings were grouped into specific domains, which were then organized into a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) framework. Ten key areas of concern identified were (i) a people-centred holistic approach, (ii) governance for quality, (iii) resources, (iv) quality culture, (v) stakeholder engagement, (vi) health management information system, (vii) workforce competency, (viii) knowledge exchange, (ix) quality indicators and (x) monitoring and evaluation of quality activities. These led to the formulation of seven strategic priorities  for the planning of improvements aimed at addressing the key areas of concern. The national definition of quality was affirmed. A total of 40 QIIs were mapped and grouped into three broad categories, namely (i) regulatory, (ii) domain-specific QIIs and (iii) Quality Improvement (QI) method. The National Policy for Quality in Healthcare for Malaysia was developed through a comprehensive situational analysis using a multi-method approach that identified priorities across national, state, institutional and community levels. This evidence-informed approach led to meaningful contextual adaptation of the NQPS framework to shape the strategic direction to advance quality and achieve effective and safe outcomes for all Malaysians.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Quality in healthcare is a fundamental pillar of health systems performance, leading to improved health outcomes and reduced waste. The World Health Organization recommends that countries establish a national quality policy and strategy (NQPS) to steer the provision of safe and high-performing healthcare services and foster a quality culture. This paper describes the development process and key content of Malaysia's new 5-year National Policy for Quality in Healthcare.
METHODS METHODS
The development process was managed by a technical working group led by the Institute for Health Systems Research in the Ministry of Health. Situational analysis was conducted through a multi-pronged approach, underpinned by a review of the past and present healthcare sectoral and quality plans and guided by the WHO NQPS framework. This approach involved: (i) review of quality-related policy documents, (ii) online surveys of healthcare providers and the public, (iii) key-informant facilitated discussions and (iv) mapping of existing quality improvement initiatives (QIIs). Data gathered from these approaches informed the content of the new policy. Following thematic analysis, the findings were grouped into specific domains, which were then organized into a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) framework.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten key areas of concern identified were (i) a people-centred holistic approach, (ii) governance for quality, (iii) resources, (iv) quality culture, (v) stakeholder engagement, (vi) health management information system, (vii) workforce competency, (viii) knowledge exchange, (ix) quality indicators and (x) monitoring and evaluation of quality activities. These led to the formulation of seven strategic priorities  for the planning of improvements aimed at addressing the key areas of concern. The national definition of quality was affirmed. A total of 40 QIIs were mapped and grouped into three broad categories, namely (i) regulatory, (ii) domain-specific QIIs and (iii) Quality Improvement (QI) method.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The National Policy for Quality in Healthcare for Malaysia was developed through a comprehensive situational analysis using a multi-method approach that identified priorities across national, state, institutional and community levels. This evidence-informed approach led to meaningful contextual adaptation of the NQPS framework to shape the strategic direction to advance quality and achieve effective and safe outcomes for all Malaysians.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37964336
doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01063-w
pii: 10.1186/s12961-023-01063-w
pmc: PMC10644427
doi:

Types de publication

Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

119

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

N Z Med J. 2003 Sep 26;116(1182):U599
pubmed: 14581951
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Jul;42(7):325-30
pubmed: 27301837
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30;31(9):G136-G138
pubmed: 31814007

Auteurs

Samsiah Awang (S)

Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Block B2, NIH Complex, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. samsiah.a@moh.gov.my.

Bruce Agins (B)

Institute for Global Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

Izzatur Rahmi Mohd Ujang (IR)

Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Block B2, NIH Complex, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Divya Nair Narayanan (DN)

Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Block B2, NIH Complex, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Nur Wahida Zulkifli (NW)

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, FF1, Level 11, Bandar Puncak Alam, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Normaizira Hamidi (N)

Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Block B2, NIH Complex, No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH