Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Journal
Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 2666-061X
Titre abrégé: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101765256
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
10
05
2023
accepted:
06
09
2023
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
15
11
2023
entrez:
15
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To identify the quantity and types of spin present in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) outcomes and to characterize the studies with spin to determine if any patterns exist. This study was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In August 2022, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus databases were searched using the terms "ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction" AND "systematic review" OR "meta-analysis." Each abstract was assessed for the presence of the 15 most common types of spin derived from a previously established methodology. General data that were extracted included study title, authors, publication year, journal, level of evidence, study design, funding source, reported adherence to PRISMA guidelines, preregistration of the study protocol, and methodologic quality per A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR 2). In total, 122 studies were identified during the preliminary search, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Each study had at least 1 form of spin. The most common type of spin identified was type 5 ("The conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies") (7/19, 36.8%). AMSTAR type 9 ("Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the RoB [risk of bias] in individual studies that were included in the review?") was associated with both a lower Clarivate Impact Factor ( Spin is highly prevalent in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate the outcomes of UCLR. Spin has been identified in peer-reviewed articles published on various topics, including many in orthopaedics. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses contain the most comprehensive evidence regarding a clinical question, so it is important to identify spin that may be included in these reports. Greater efforts are needed to ensure that the abstracts of papers accurately represent the results in the full text.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37965531
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100808
pii: S2666-061X(23)00159-1
pmc: PMC10641735
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
100808Informations de copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 3;:47-57
pubmed: 33823157
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;49(5):1355-1362
pubmed: 32791013
Sports Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;7(6):511-7
pubmed: 26502444
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):32
pubmed: 30764774
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1743-1750
pubmed: 35472573
Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Dec 09;3(12):2325967115618914
pubmed: 26740956
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):1005-12
pubmed: 27197888
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):1157-1165
pubmed: 34181472
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Mar;11(1):48-54
pubmed: 29335854
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Oct;68(8):1158-63
pubmed: 3771597
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 13;14:81-88
pubmed: 32021071
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):437-42
pubmed: 11757886
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2510-6
pubmed: 24220014
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1158-64
pubmed: 15262637
JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2058-64
pubmed: 20501928
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:72-7
pubmed: 17279038
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):561-571
pubmed: 29433647
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 28;8(12):2325967120966310
pubmed: 33748295
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan 19;:2197-2205
pubmed: 33482369
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):108-9
pubmed: 20630580
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(1):1-10
pubmed: 30649511
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89
pubmed: 33781348
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Mar 19;9(3):2325967120988736
pubmed: 33796587
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008
pubmed: 28935701
Am J Nurs. 2014 Mar;114(3):53-8
pubmed: 24572533
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:133-140
pubmed: 31152864
HSS J. 2020 Oct;16(3):242-249
pubmed: 33088238
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:MR000033
pubmed: 28207928
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(8):2324-2338
pubmed: 34491153
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Dec;27(12):2284-2291
pubmed: 30318276
J ISAKOS. 2021 Sep;6(5):290-294
pubmed: 34001506
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:56-65
pubmed: 26845744
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1193-205
pubmed: 18490476
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1603-1612
pubmed: 30132025
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Jun 1;29(2):e9-e17
pubmed: 33972489
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Mar 28;6(1):24730114211000637
pubmed: 35097436
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 02;9(12):23259671211055726
pubmed: 34881347
Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2953-2959
pubmed: 33887409
J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Nov;136(11):e109-e114
pubmed: 27772550