The legitimacy of pain according to sufferers.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
07
2022
accepted:
23
08
2023
medline:
17
11
2023
pubmed:
15
11
2023
entrez:
15
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pain is an unpleasant experience that we will all experience in some form over the course of our lives, with chronic pain affecting a significant proportion of the global population. Given these circumstances, this study investigates whether pain is a legitimated phenomenon and considers the processes involved in the creation of such a status. This is an exploratory investigation based on semi-structured interviews with people suffering from chronic pain as a consequence of physical, psychological, emotional, or social circumstances. Our principal objective is to explore the fundamental elements of legitimacy and the processes that bring it into being-i.e., to understand how it is socially constructed. The main finding, however, is that many sufferers of chronic physical, psychiatric/psychological, emotional and social pain perceive that their pain is not considered legitimate when no clear cause can be identified, when the pain prevents them from developing the norms imposed by social roles or when it inhibits them to make a productive contribution to the society in which they live. This is generally due to the disruptive aspect of pain and its impact on the social structure, specifically on productivity, which nowadays constitutes a key element in the legitimation of any social phenomenon.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37967079
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291112
pii: PONE-D-22-18991
pmc: PMC10651017
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0291112Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 García-Rodríguez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2243-52
pubmed: 14512253
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Dec;40(8):680-90
pubmed: 16725157
J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1176-1186
pubmed: 30954540
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2003 May;9(2):62-8
pubmed: 12697156
Cell. 2009 Oct 16;139(2):267-84
pubmed: 19837031
Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982
pubmed: 32694387
Aten Primaria. 2020 Apr;52(4):267-272
pubmed: 31892425
Biomed Pharmacother. 2006 Aug;60(7):329-35
pubmed: 16814978
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Dec;67(6):607-11
pubmed: 19913665
Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):129-36
pubmed: 847460
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1033-1052
pubmed: 33078878
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Sep;62(3):302-317
pubmed: 34283649
Health (London). 2021 Jan;25(1):121-137
pubmed: 31216871
Perspect Biol Med. 2001 Fall;44(4):575-83
pubmed: 11600803
Salud Colect. 2013 Aug;9(2):195-214
pubmed: 23989626