Impact of Dialysate and Plasma Sodium on Mortality in a Global Historical Hemodialysis Cohort.


Journal

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
ISSN: 1533-3450
Titre abrégé: J Am Soc Nephrol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9013836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 10 08 2023
accepted: 12 10 2023
medline: 15 11 2023
pubmed: 15 11 2023
entrez: 15 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Excess mortality in hemodialysis patients is largely due to cardiovascular disease and is associated with abnormal fluid status and plasma sodium concentrations. Ultrafiltration facilitates the removal of fluid and sodium, whereas diffusive exchange of sodium plays a pivotal role in sodium removal and tonicity adjustment. Lower dialysate sodium may increase sodium removal at the expense of hypotonicity, reduced blood volume refilling, and intradialytic hypotension risk. Higher dialysate sodium preserves blood volume and hemodynamic stability but reduces sodium removal. In this retrospective cohort, we aimed to assess whether prescribing a dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/L has an impact on survival outcomes compared with dialysate sodium >138 mmol/L after adjusting for plasma sodium concentration. The study population included incident hemodialysis patients from 875 Fresenius Medical Care Nephrocare clinics in 25 countries between 2010 and 2019. Baseline dialysate sodium (≤138 or >138 mmol/L) and plasma sodium (<135, 135-142, >142 mmol/L) concentrations defined exposure status. We used multivariable Cox regression model stratified by country to model the association between time-varying dialysate and plasma sodium exposure and all-cause mortality, adjusted for demographic and treatment variables, including bioimpedance measures of fluid status. In 2,123,957 patient-months from 68,196 incident hemodialysis patients with on average 3 hemodialysis sessions per week dialysate sodium of 138 mmol/l was prescribed in 63.2%, 139 mmol/l in 15.8%, 140 mmol/l in 20.7%, and other concentrations in 0.4% of patients. Most clinical centers (78.6%) used a standardized concentration. During a median follow-up of 40 months, one-third of patients (n= 21,644) died. Dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/l was associated with higher mortality (multivariate HR for the total population (1.57, 95% CI,1.25-1.98), adjusted for plasma sodium concentrations and other confounding variables. Subgroup analysis did not show any evidence of effect modification by plasma sodium concentrations or other patient specific variables. These observational findings stress the need for randomized evidence to reliably define optimal standard dialysate sodium prescribing practices.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Excess mortality in hemodialysis patients is largely due to cardiovascular disease and is associated with abnormal fluid status and plasma sodium concentrations. Ultrafiltration facilitates the removal of fluid and sodium, whereas diffusive exchange of sodium plays a pivotal role in sodium removal and tonicity adjustment. Lower dialysate sodium may increase sodium removal at the expense of hypotonicity, reduced blood volume refilling, and intradialytic hypotension risk. Higher dialysate sodium preserves blood volume and hemodynamic stability but reduces sodium removal. In this retrospective cohort, we aimed to assess whether prescribing a dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/L has an impact on survival outcomes compared with dialysate sodium >138 mmol/L after adjusting for plasma sodium concentration.
METHODS METHODS
The study population included incident hemodialysis patients from 875 Fresenius Medical Care Nephrocare clinics in 25 countries between 2010 and 2019. Baseline dialysate sodium (≤138 or >138 mmol/L) and plasma sodium (<135, 135-142, >142 mmol/L) concentrations defined exposure status. We used multivariable Cox regression model stratified by country to model the association between time-varying dialysate and plasma sodium exposure and all-cause mortality, adjusted for demographic and treatment variables, including bioimpedance measures of fluid status.
RESULTS RESULTS
In 2,123,957 patient-months from 68,196 incident hemodialysis patients with on average 3 hemodialysis sessions per week dialysate sodium of 138 mmol/l was prescribed in 63.2%, 139 mmol/l in 15.8%, 140 mmol/l in 20.7%, and other concentrations in 0.4% of patients. Most clinical centers (78.6%) used a standardized concentration. During a median follow-up of 40 months, one-third of patients (n= 21,644) died. Dialysate sodium ≤138 mmol/l was associated with higher mortality (multivariate HR for the total population (1.57, 95% CI,1.25-1.98), adjusted for plasma sodium concentrations and other confounding variables. Subgroup analysis did not show any evidence of effect modification by plasma sodium concentrations or other patient specific variables.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These observational findings stress the need for randomized evidence to reliably define optimal standard dialysate sodium prescribing practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37967469
doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000262
pii: 00001751-990000000-00213
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 413657723

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Auteurs

Jule Pinter (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg Germany.

Brendan Smyth (B)

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Stefano Stuard (S)

Global Medical Office, FMC Germany, Bad Homburg, Germany.

Meg Jardine (M)

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Christoph Wanner (C)

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg Germany.
Department of Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Renal Research Unit, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Patrick Rossignol (P)

Université de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique 1433 CHRU de Nancy, U1116 Inserm and F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Nancy, France.
Princess Grace Hospital, and Monaco Private Hemodialysis Centre, Monaco.

David C Wheeler (DC)

Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, United Kingdom.

Mark R Marshall (MR)

Middlemore Hospital, Otahuhu, Auckland, New Zealand.

Bernard Canaud (B)

University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Bernd Genser (B)

High5Data GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of General Medicine, Center for Preventive Medicine & Digital Health, Mannheim Medical Faculty, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH