Devices and furniture for small and sick newborn care: systematic development of a planning and costing tool.
Budgeting
Costing
Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Medical Devices
Medical Equipment
Neonatal
Newborn
Planning
Scale-up
Small and Sick Newborn Care
Journal
BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
04
05
2023
accepted:
12
10
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
16
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-quality neonatal care requires sufficient functional medical devices, furniture, fixtures, and use by trained healthcare workers, however there is lack of publicly available tools for quantification and costing. This paper describes development and use of a planning and costing tool regarding furniture, fixtures and devices to support scale-up of WHO level-2 neonatal care, for national and global newborn survival targets. We followed a systematic process. First, we reviewed planning and costing tools of relevance. Second, we co-designed a new tool to estimate furniture and device set-up costs for a default 40-bed level-2 neonatal unit, incorporating input from multi-disciplinary experts and newborn care guidelines. Furniture and device lists were based off WHO guidelines/norms, UNICEF and national manuals/guides. Due to lack of evidence-based quantification, ratios were based on operational manuals, multi-country facility assessment data, and expert opinion. Default unit costs were from government procurement agency costs in Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Third, we refined the tool by national use in Tanzania. The tool adapts activity-based costing (ABC) to estimate quantities and costs to equip a level-2 neonatal unit based on three components: (1) furniture/fixtures (18 default but editable items); (2) neonatal medical devices (16 product categories with minimum specifications for use in low-resource settings); (3) user training at device installation. The tool was used in Tanzania to generate procurement lists and cost estimates for level-2 scale-up in 171 hospitals (146 District and 25 Regional Referral). Total incremental cost of all new furniture and equipment acquisition, installation, and user training were US$93,000 per District hospital (level-2 care) and US$346,000 per Regional Referral hospital. Estimated cost per capita for whole-country district coverage was US$0.23, representing 0.57% increase in government health expenditure per capita and additional 0.35% for all Regional Referral hospitals. Given 2.3 million neonatal deaths and potential impact of level-2 newborn care, rational and efficient planning of devices linked to systems change is foundational. In future iterations, we aim to include consumables, spare parts, and maintenance cost options. More rigorous implementation research data are crucial to formulating evidence-based ratios for devices numbers per baby. Use of this tool could help overcome gaps in devices numbers, advance efficiency and quality of neonatal care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
High-quality neonatal care requires sufficient functional medical devices, furniture, fixtures, and use by trained healthcare workers, however there is lack of publicly available tools for quantification and costing. This paper describes development and use of a planning and costing tool regarding furniture, fixtures and devices to support scale-up of WHO level-2 neonatal care, for national and global newborn survival targets.
METHODS
METHODS
We followed a systematic process. First, we reviewed planning and costing tools of relevance. Second, we co-designed a new tool to estimate furniture and device set-up costs for a default 40-bed level-2 neonatal unit, incorporating input from multi-disciplinary experts and newborn care guidelines. Furniture and device lists were based off WHO guidelines/norms, UNICEF and national manuals/guides. Due to lack of evidence-based quantification, ratios were based on operational manuals, multi-country facility assessment data, and expert opinion. Default unit costs were from government procurement agency costs in Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Third, we refined the tool by national use in Tanzania.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The tool adapts activity-based costing (ABC) to estimate quantities and costs to equip a level-2 neonatal unit based on three components: (1) furniture/fixtures (18 default but editable items); (2) neonatal medical devices (16 product categories with minimum specifications for use in low-resource settings); (3) user training at device installation. The tool was used in Tanzania to generate procurement lists and cost estimates for level-2 scale-up in 171 hospitals (146 District and 25 Regional Referral). Total incremental cost of all new furniture and equipment acquisition, installation, and user training were US$93,000 per District hospital (level-2 care) and US$346,000 per Regional Referral hospital. Estimated cost per capita for whole-country district coverage was US$0.23, representing 0.57% increase in government health expenditure per capita and additional 0.35% for all Regional Referral hospitals.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Given 2.3 million neonatal deaths and potential impact of level-2 newborn care, rational and efficient planning of devices linked to systems change is foundational. In future iterations, we aim to include consumables, spare parts, and maintenance cost options. More rigorous implementation research data are crucial to formulating evidence-based ratios for devices numbers per baby. Use of this tool could help overcome gaps in devices numbers, advance efficiency and quality of neonatal care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37968613
doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04363-w
pii: 10.1186/s12887-023-04363-w
pmc: PMC10652422
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
566Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 21;14:100212
pubmed: 34528000
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 15;23(Suppl 2):567
pubmed: 37968588
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 29;4(5):e001785
pubmed: 31637029
Global Health. 2017 Aug 18;13(1):59
pubmed: 28821280
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:528-35
pubmed: 18055957
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Jul;49(7):719-22
pubmed: 21597999
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar;26(3):399-400
pubmed: 35519917
Value Health. 2021 Aug;24(8):1213-1222
pubmed: 34372987
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):463-472
pubmed: 33840423
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Sep;30(17-18):2514-2539
pubmed: 33656214
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):59-69
pubmed: 29088357
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S7
pubmed: 26391335
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(Suppl 4):782
pubmed: 29143622
F1000Res. 2018 Feb 7;7:157
pubmed: 29560256
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70
pubmed: 24853604
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Jan;18(1):117-28
pubmed: 23279380
Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(4):100-7
pubmed: 23113171
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 15;23(Suppl 2):569
pubmed: 37968578
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019 Jun 18;5:10
pubmed: 31236281
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Apr;3(4):e211-e212
pubmed: 33640307
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):189-205
pubmed: 24853593
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S1
pubmed: 26390820
Lancet. 2014 Aug 2;384(9941):438-54
pubmed: 24853600
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e374-e386
pubmed: 32035034
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 4;2(2):e000205
pubmed: 28589020
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Nov;11(11):e1785-e1793
pubmed: 37858588
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 15;23(Suppl 2):564
pubmed: 37968603
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Mar 7;4(2):e001195
pubmed: 30997163