Organizational Intent, Organizational Structures, and Reviewer Mental Models Influence Mortality Review Processes.
Journal
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
ISSN: 2542-4548
Titre abrégé: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101728275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
16
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To identify the factors that influence the mortality review process at health systems, including how mortality review is conducted, cases are adjudicated, and results are used. We conducted a qualitative analysis of the mortality review processes of 6 US health systems from February 1, 2021 to June 31, 2021. The data sources included individual and small-group semi-structured interviews with mortality review team members and a content analysis of site artifacts (eg, guiding principles, chart abstraction forms, review workflows, and clinical pathways developed from past mortality reviews). We analyzed each site's mortality review process, goals and incentives for mortality review, historical and evolving aspects of mortality review, personnel involved, and post-review use of findings. Across the 6 systems, we interviewed a total of 24 mortality review experts and analyzed 26 site documents. We identified 3 thematic factors that influence mortality review processes: organizational intent, organizational structures for mortality review, and the mental models of individuals involved in the review process. Two subthemes emerged within organizational intent: (1) identifying preventable deaths to lower (clinical or financial) risk and (2) using death cases to guide system improvement. Sites varied in governance and decision rights concerning mortality review and adjudication, with 2 subthemes within organizational structures: (1) centralized-hierarchical and (2) decentralized or multidisciplinary. The analysis of mental models of participating reviewers revealed 2 themes: (1) confirmation of preventability and (2) identification of patterns or "signals." Understanding the factors that influence mortality review allows health systems to better leverage mortality review for institutional improvement and to develop training that builds shared mental models to enhance the review process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37969423
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.004
pii: S2542-4548(23)00062-0
pmc: PMC10632187
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
515-523Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Références
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Int J Immunogenet. 2013 Feb;40(1):46-53
pubmed: 23280068
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):576-85
pubmed: 22556308
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
J Patient Saf. 2014 Mar;10(1):6-12
pubmed: 24553440
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):670-9
pubmed: 24922130
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jun;29(6):499-508
pubmed: 31776201
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Sep;37(9):400-8
pubmed: 21995256