Comparison of trends of inpatient charges among primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty over a decade: a regional database study.
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Cost effectiveness
Hemiarthroplasty
Inpatient charges
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Shoulder arthroplasty
Trends
Utilization
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
16
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study examined trends in inpatient charges for primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and revision total shoulder arthroplasty (revTSA) over the past decade. The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for patients undergoing primary aTSA, rTSA, HA, and revTSA from 2010 to 2020 using International Classification of Diseases procedure codes. The primary outcome measured was total charges per encounter. Secondary outcomes included accommodation and ancillary charges, charges covered by insurance, and facility volume. Ancillary charges were defined as fees for diagnostic and therapeutic services and accommodation charges were defined as fees associated with room and board. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between high- and low-volume centers. During the study period, 46,044 shoulder arthroplasty cases were performed: 18,653 aTSA, 4002 HA, 19,253 rTSA, and 4136 revTSA. An exponential increase in rTSA (2428%) and considerable decrease in HA (83.9%) volumes were observed during this period. Total charges were the highest for rTSA and revTSA and the lowest for aTSA. Subgroup analysis of revTSA by indication revealed that total charges were the highest for periprosthetic fractures. For aTSA, rTSA, and HA, high-volume centers achieved significantly lower total charges compared to low-volume centers. Over the study period, total inpatient charges increased by 57.2%, 38.4%, 102.4%, and 68.4% for aTSA, rTSA, HA, and revTSA, outpacing the inflation rate of 18.7%. Total inpatient charges for all arthroplasty types increased dramatically from 2010 to 2020, outpacing inflation rates, but high-volume centers demonstrated greater success at mitigating charge increases compared to low-volume centers.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
This study examined trends in inpatient charges for primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and revision total shoulder arthroplasty (revTSA) over the past decade.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was queried for patients undergoing primary aTSA, rTSA, HA, and revTSA from 2010 to 2020 using International Classification of Diseases procedure codes. The primary outcome measured was total charges per encounter. Secondary outcomes included accommodation and ancillary charges, charges covered by insurance, and facility volume. Ancillary charges were defined as fees for diagnostic and therapeutic services and accommodation charges were defined as fees associated with room and board. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between high- and low-volume centers.
Results
UNASSIGNED
During the study period, 46,044 shoulder arthroplasty cases were performed: 18,653 aTSA, 4002 HA, 19,253 rTSA, and 4136 revTSA. An exponential increase in rTSA (2428%) and considerable decrease in HA (83.9%) volumes were observed during this period. Total charges were the highest for rTSA and revTSA and the lowest for aTSA. Subgroup analysis of revTSA by indication revealed that total charges were the highest for periprosthetic fractures. For aTSA, rTSA, and HA, high-volume centers achieved significantly lower total charges compared to low-volume centers. Over the study period, total inpatient charges increased by 57.2%, 38.4%, 102.4%, and 68.4% for aTSA, rTSA, HA, and revTSA, outpacing the inflation rate of 18.7%.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Total inpatient charges for all arthroplasty types increased dramatically from 2010 to 2020, outpacing inflation rates, but high-volume centers demonstrated greater success at mitigating charge increases compared to low-volume centers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37969516
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.001
pii: S2666-6383(23)00213-X
pmc: PMC10638600
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2492-2499Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Références
Orthop Clin North Am. 1998 Jul;29(3):519-33
pubmed: 9706297
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 21;97(20):1653-60
pubmed: 26491129
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1399-1406
pubmed: 28734539
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:372
pubmed: 26358055
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):599-607
pubmed: 18213509
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Feb 15;26(4):133-141
pubmed: 29351136
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Dec;22(12):1612-22
pubmed: 23566674
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):e451-e461
pubmed: 32414608
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2019 Mar;77(2):136-139
pubmed: 31128584
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86(3):496-505
pubmed: 14996874
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):113-119
pubmed: 32807371
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Dec;19(8):1115-20
pubmed: 20554454
Orthopedics. 2020 Mar 1;43(2):119-125
pubmed: 31930413
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):2601-2609
pubmed: 33190759
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1334-1340
pubmed: 30827836
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun 15;27(12):426-436
pubmed: 31170096
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jul 14;6(3):
pubmed: 34278185
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jun;28(6):1066-1073
pubmed: 30685279
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Mar;24(3):460-7
pubmed: 25441557
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S82-S87
pubmed: 29776473
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):924-930
pubmed: 31780336
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Mar 4;102(5):404-409
pubmed: 31714468
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):120-126
pubmed: 32778384