Size and morphology of the coracoid and glenoid in pediatric and adolescent patients: implications for Latarjet procedure.
Adolescent
Coracoid
Glenoid
Latarjet
Pediatric
Radiographic
Shoulder instability
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
16
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glenohumeral instability is a challenging problem in children and adolescents. For patients with anterior glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet procedure is an effective treatment option. However, concerns about coracoid size and morphology may limit its utilization within this patient population. The purpose of this study was to establish normative data on coracoid and glenoid size and morphology among a large cohort of adolescent patients and describe the anatomic relationships with demographic factors. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of 584 patients aged 12-21 years after a chest computed tomography scan for non-shoulder related trauma at a single level I trauma center. Demographic characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record, and the following coracoid anatomic measurements were obtained from computed tomography scans: coracoid length, coracoid thickness, coracoid width, glenoid height, and glenoid width. The ratio of coracoid thickness to glenoid width was calculated to estimate the percent bone loss that could be addressed with a traditional Latarjet coracoid transfer. To ensure reliability among 3 reviewers, all measured the same 25 scans and inter-rater reliability was excellent with all Kappa coefficients >0.81. The remaining scans were divided equally and assessed separately by these reviewers. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the relationships between all anatomic measures and the age, weight, and height of individuals. Growth curves for each measurement were modeled using quantile regression with height and height∗height as predictors. Additionally, we stratified the growth curves by sex, when significant. Of the 584 subjects, 55% were male, and average age was 19 years (range 12, 21). All growth curves illustrated increase anatomic size across the height range of 145-190 cm. The growth curve including all patients (Fig. 1) illustrated that the 50% percentile of median coracoid length increased from approximately 28 to 32 mm. In addition to height, sex was a significant predictor for coracoid width and glenoid width. The median coracoid width increased from approximately 9.5 to 10.2 mm for females compared to an increased width from approximately 10 to 11 mm for males. The median glenoid width for females increased from approximately 21 to 25 mm and for males the median glenoid width increased from just under 22 to 25.5 mm. Among children and adolescents, coracoid and glenoid size are correlated with patient height. These data can help guide patient selection for the Latarjet procedure.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Glenohumeral instability is a challenging problem in children and adolescents. For patients with anterior glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet procedure is an effective treatment option. However, concerns about coracoid size and morphology may limit its utilization within this patient population. The purpose of this study was to establish normative data on coracoid and glenoid size and morphology among a large cohort of adolescent patients and describe the anatomic relationships with demographic factors.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of 584 patients aged 12-21 years after a chest computed tomography scan for non-shoulder related trauma at a single level I trauma center. Demographic characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record, and the following coracoid anatomic measurements were obtained from computed tomography scans: coracoid length, coracoid thickness, coracoid width, glenoid height, and glenoid width. The ratio of coracoid thickness to glenoid width was calculated to estimate the percent bone loss that could be addressed with a traditional Latarjet coracoid transfer. To ensure reliability among 3 reviewers, all measured the same 25 scans and inter-rater reliability was excellent with all Kappa coefficients >0.81. The remaining scans were divided equally and assessed separately by these reviewers. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the relationships between all anatomic measures and the age, weight, and height of individuals. Growth curves for each measurement were modeled using quantile regression with height and height∗height as predictors. Additionally, we stratified the growth curves by sex, when significant. Of the 584 subjects, 55% were male, and average age was 19 years (range 12, 21).
Results
UNASSIGNED
All growth curves illustrated increase anatomic size across the height range of 145-190 cm. The growth curve including all patients (Fig. 1) illustrated that the 50% percentile of median coracoid length increased from approximately 28 to 32 mm. In addition to height, sex was a significant predictor for coracoid width and glenoid width. The median coracoid width increased from approximately 9.5 to 10.2 mm for females compared to an increased width from approximately 10 to 11 mm for males. The median glenoid width for females increased from approximately 21 to 25 mm and for males the median glenoid width increased from just under 22 to 25.5 mm.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Among children and adolescents, coracoid and glenoid size are correlated with patient height. These data can help guide patient selection for the Latarjet procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37969517
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.014
pii: S2666-6383(23)00059-2
pmc: PMC10638555
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2289-2295Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):87-94
pubmed: 19059896
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):311-320
pubmed: 35048737
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Apr;13(2):164-172
pubmed: 32076937
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1719-25
pubmed: 25883168
Arthroscopy. 2012 Mar;28(3):309-15
pubmed: 22130494
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(6):470-4
pubmed: 11155298
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug 15;28(16):e706-e715
pubmed: 32769719
JBJS Rev. 2020 Feb;8(2):e0080
pubmed: 32015270
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):280-287
pubmed: 34040805
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):411-424
pubmed: 29038951
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Dec;36(12):2392-7
pubmed: 18755935
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8):889-93
pubmed: 26563924
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Jan 15;29(2):e51-e61
pubmed: 33275397
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1422-9
pubmed: 25794869
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):946-952
pubmed: 28049592
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jun;34(4):421-5
pubmed: 24172677
Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1675-1681
pubmed: 26728614
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):35-46
pubmed: 10653082
Am J Sports Med. 2007 May;35(5):811-7
pubmed: 17293463
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;51(3):177-184
pubmed: 27834676
HSS J. 2018 Oct;14(3):238-244
pubmed: 30258327
Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov;30(11):1400-5
pubmed: 25085048
Lyon Chir. 1954 Nov-Dec;49(8):994-7
pubmed: 13234709
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Mar;31(3):183-9
pubmed: 18936873
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Sep 17;7(9):2325967119868995
pubmed: 31555715
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Apr;22(4):485-8
pubmed: 22929584
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1403-1411
pubmed: 29395551
Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1021-6
pubmed: 20678698
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Mar 17;7(1):15
pubmed: 32185534
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jun;21(6):815-21
pubmed: 22217638
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1206-1213
pubmed: 31812583
Arthroscopy. 2016 May;32(5):944-52
pubmed: 26921126
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 24;15(1):69
pubmed: 32093704
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6307019
pubmed: 28484716
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Aug 20;96(16):1340-8
pubmed: 25143494
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):1975-1981
pubmed: 28333542
Bone Joint J. 2014 Mar;96-B(3):354-9
pubmed: 24589791
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jul;41(3):407-15
pubmed: 20497815
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1030-1038
pubmed: 29389219
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;22(2):286-92
pubmed: 23352473
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 16;8(12):2325967120967914
pubmed: 33403213
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1390-7
pubmed: 23925743
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):88-94
pubmed: 30121152
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1664-7
pubmed: 22562790
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):398-404
pubmed: 29100772
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Feb;23(1):56-59
pubmed: 31980235