Patient Engagement and Provider Effectiveness of a Novel Sleep Telehealth Platform and Remote Monitoring Assessment in the US Military: Pilot Study Providing Evidence-Based Sleep Treatment Recommendations.

application behavioral care effective care effectiveness insomnia monitoring obstructive sleep apnea patient engagement remote monitoring sleep sleep disorders telehealth wearables

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 30 03 2023
accepted: 11 09 2023
revised: 07 09 2023
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 17 11 2023
entrez: 16 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Sleep problems are common and costly in the US military. Yet, within the military health system, there is a gross shortage of trained specialist providers to address sleep problems. As a result, demand for sleep medicine care far exceeds the available supply. Telehealth including telemedicine, mobile health, and wearables represents promising approaches to increase access to high-quality and cost-effective care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient engagement and provider perceived effectiveness of a novel sleep telehealth platform and remote monitoring assessment in the US military. The platform includes a desktop web portal, native mobile app, and integrated wearable sensors (ie, a commercial off-the-shelf sleep tracker [Fitbit]). The goal of the remote monitoring assessment was to provide evidence-based sleep treatment recommendations to patients and providers. Patients with sleep problems were recruited from the Internal Medicine clinic at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Patients completed intensive remote monitoring assessments over 10 days (including a baseline intake questionnaire, daily sleep diaries, and 2 daily symptom surveys), and wore a Fitbit sleep tracker. Following the remote monitoring period, patients received assessment results and personalized sleep education in the mobile app. In parallel, providers received a provisional patient assessment report in an editable electronic document format. Patient engagement was assessed via behavioral adherence metrics that were determined a priori. Patients also completed a brief survey regarding ease of completion. Provider effectiveness was assessed via an anonymous survey. In total, 35 patients with sleep problems participated in the study. There were no dropouts. Results indicated a high level of engagement with the sleep telehealth platform, with all participants having completed the baseline remote assessment, reviewed their personalized sleep assessment report, and completed the satisfaction survey. Patients completed 95.1% of sleep diaries and 95.3% of symptom surveys over 10 days. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most aspects of the remote monitoring assessment. In total, 24 primary care providers also participated and completed the anonymous survey. The results indicate high levels of perceived effectiveness and identified important potential benefits from adopting a sleep telehealth approach throughout the US military health care system. Military patients with sleep problems and military primary care providers demonstrated high levels of engagement and satisfaction with a novel sleep telehealth platform and remote monitoring assessment. Sleep telehealth approaches represent a potential pathway to increase access to evidence-based sleep medicine care in the US military. Further evaluation is warranted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sleep problems are common and costly in the US military. Yet, within the military health system, there is a gross shortage of trained specialist providers to address sleep problems. As a result, demand for sleep medicine care far exceeds the available supply. Telehealth including telemedicine, mobile health, and wearables represents promising approaches to increase access to high-quality and cost-effective care.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient engagement and provider perceived effectiveness of a novel sleep telehealth platform and remote monitoring assessment in the US military. The platform includes a desktop web portal, native mobile app, and integrated wearable sensors (ie, a commercial off-the-shelf sleep tracker [Fitbit]). The goal of the remote monitoring assessment was to provide evidence-based sleep treatment recommendations to patients and providers.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with sleep problems were recruited from the Internal Medicine clinic at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Patients completed intensive remote monitoring assessments over 10 days (including a baseline intake questionnaire, daily sleep diaries, and 2 daily symptom surveys), and wore a Fitbit sleep tracker. Following the remote monitoring period, patients received assessment results and personalized sleep education in the mobile app. In parallel, providers received a provisional patient assessment report in an editable electronic document format. Patient engagement was assessed via behavioral adherence metrics that were determined a priori. Patients also completed a brief survey regarding ease of completion. Provider effectiveness was assessed via an anonymous survey.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 35 patients with sleep problems participated in the study. There were no dropouts. Results indicated a high level of engagement with the sleep telehealth platform, with all participants having completed the baseline remote assessment, reviewed their personalized sleep assessment report, and completed the satisfaction survey. Patients completed 95.1% of sleep diaries and 95.3% of symptom surveys over 10 days. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most aspects of the remote monitoring assessment. In total, 24 primary care providers also participated and completed the anonymous survey. The results indicate high levels of perceived effectiveness and identified important potential benefits from adopting a sleep telehealth approach throughout the US military health care system.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Military patients with sleep problems and military primary care providers demonstrated high levels of engagement and satisfaction with a novel sleep telehealth platform and remote monitoring assessment. Sleep telehealth approaches represent a potential pathway to increase access to evidence-based sleep medicine care in the US military. Further evaluation is warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37971788
pii: v7i1e47356
doi: 10.2196/47356
pmc: PMC10690521
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e47356

Informations de copyright

©Emerson M Wickwire, Jacob Collen, Vincent F Capaldi, Scott G Williams, Samson Z Assefa, Julianna P Adornetti, Kathleen Huang, Janet M Venezia, Rachell L Jones, Christine W Johnston, Connie Thomas, Mary Ann Thomas, Charles Mounts, Christopher L Drake, Michael S Businelle, Michael A Grandner, Rachel Manber, Jennifer S Albrecht. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 16.11.2023.

Références

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):377-89
pubmed: 18025970
Sleep Med Clin. 2020 Sep;15(3):359-375
pubmed: 32762969
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1206-11
pubmed: 27170304
Sleep. 2022 Jul 11;45(7):
pubmed: 35700011
Mil Med. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):e941-e947
pubmed: 34424328
Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):215-226
pubmed: 30218649
Mil Med. 2022 Aug 25;187(9-10):e1201-e1208
pubmed: 35089344
Fed Pract. 2017 Feb;34(2):32-36
pubmed: 30766255
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 May 1;169(9):1052-63
pubmed: 19299406
Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):110-23
pubmed: 23137169
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Jun 15;11(6):591-2
pubmed: 25979105
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 9;5(12):e29573
pubmed: 34889746
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):947-961
pubmed: 30664857
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Aug;16(8):459
pubmed: 24942599
Sleep. 2011 Sep 01;34(9):1189-95
pubmed: 21886356
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Jul 24;8(3):e12408
pubmed: 31342904
Sleep Med Rev. 2016 Dec;30:72-82
pubmed: 26874067
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Oct 15;11(10):1187-98
pubmed: 26414983
Sleep Health. 2015 Mar;1(1):40-43
pubmed: 29073412
Mil Med Res. 2020 Mar 10;7(1):10
pubmed: 32151283
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Oct 5;131(7):485-91
pubmed: 10507956
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941

Auteurs

Emerson M Wickwire (EM)

Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Jacob Collen (J)

Sleep Disorders Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Vincent F Capaldi (VF)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Scott G Williams (SG)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Samson Z Assefa (SZ)

Sleep Disorders Center, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA, United States.

Julianna P Adornetti (JP)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Kathleen Huang (K)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Janet M Venezia (JM)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Rachell L Jones (RL)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Christine W Johnston (CW)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Connie Thomas (C)

Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Mary Ann Thomas (MA)

Sleep Disorders Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Charles Mounts (C)

Sleep Disorders Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Christopher L Drake (CL)

Sleep Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.

Michael S Businelle (MS)

TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Michael A Grandner (MA)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Rachel Manber (R)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Jennifer S Albrecht (JS)

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Classifications MeSH