Differences in the genomic diversity, structure, and inbreeding patterns in wild and managed populations of Agave potatorum Zucc. used in the production of Tobalá mezcal in Southern Mexico.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
03
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
17
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Agave potatorum Zucc. locally known as Tobalá, is an important species for mezcal production. It is a perennial species that takes 10 to 15 years to reach reproductive age. Because of high demand of Tobalá mezcal and the slow maturation of the plants, its wild populations have been under intense anthropogenic pressure. The main objective of this study was to estimate the genome-wide diversity in A. potatorum and determine if the type of management has had any effect on its diversity, inbreeding and structure. We analyzed 174 individuals (105 wild, 42 cultivated and 27 from nurseries) from 34 sites with a reduced representation genomic method (ddRADseq), using 14,875 SNPs. The diversity measured as expected heterozygosity was higher in the nursery and wild plants than in cultivated samples. We did not find private alleles in the cultivated and nursery plants, which indicates that the individuals under management recently derived from wild populations, which was supported by higher gene flow estimated from wild populations to the managed plants. We found low but positive levels of inbreeding (FIS = 0.082), probably related to isolation of the populations. We detected low genetic differentiation among populations (FST = 0.0796), with positive and significant isolation by distance. The population genetic structure in the species seems to be related to elevation and ecology, with higher gene flow among populations in less fragmented areas. We detected an outlier locus related to the recognition of pollen, which is also relevant to self-incompatibility protein (SI). Due to seed harvest and long generation time, the loss of diversity in A. potatorum has been gradual and artificial selection and incipient management have not yet caused drastic differences between cultivated and wild plants. Also, we described an agroecological alternative to the uncontrolled extraction of wild individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37972146
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294534
pii: PONE-D-23-08039
pmc: PMC10653438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0294534Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Ruiz Mondragón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Trends Genet. 2014 Feb;30(2):57-65
pubmed: 24290193
Science. 1997 Dec 19;278(5346):2075-80
pubmed: 9405336
Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 27;12(1):
pubmed: 36616253
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Oct;11(10):413-8
pubmed: 21237900
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 18;12:246
pubmed: 21682921
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):3070-1
pubmed: 21926124
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jul;7(7):473-83
pubmed: 16829979
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8
pubmed: 21653522
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1037-45
pubmed: 12831470
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):946-52
pubmed: 23738873
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 17;10:e14398
pubmed: 36415865
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2358:17-43
pubmed: 34270044
Ann Bot. 2005 Nov;96(6):953-63
pubmed: 16159942
Evol Appl. 2018 Sep 17;12(1):3-5
pubmed: 30622630
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Sep 03;10:63
pubmed: 25185769
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 May;1195:84-98
pubmed: 20536818
PeerJ. 2014 Mar 04;2:e281
pubmed: 24688859
Am J Bot. 2023 Aug;110(8):e16216
pubmed: 37478873
Am J Bot. 2011 Sep;98(9):1389-414
pubmed: 21865506
Ann Bot. 2007 Nov;100(5):893-901
pubmed: 17940074
Trends Genet. 2015 Dec;31(12):709-719
pubmed: 26603610
Am J Bot. 2021 Feb;108(2):216-235
pubmed: 33576061
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 1;88(19):8816-20
pubmed: 1681543
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 27;11(11):
pubmed: 35684199
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):67-77
pubmed: 27601374
Nature. 2009 Feb 12;457(7231):843-8
pubmed: 19212403
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jun;3(6):429-41
pubmed: 12042770
Am J Bot. 2014 Oct;101(10):1780-90
pubmed: 25326620
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):913-6
pubmed: 10706292
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
BMC Genet. 2010 Aug 20;11:77
pubmed: 20727153
Bioinformatics. 2001 Sep;17(9):847-8
pubmed: 11590104
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 15;36(8):2592-2594
pubmed: 31904816
Ann Eugen. 1951 Mar;15(4):323-54
pubmed: 24540312
Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):968-80
pubmed: 16913941
Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(21):4638-47
pubmed: 20874760
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020 Jan 16;16(1):3
pubmed: 31948439
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3530-5
pubmed: 21245334
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jul 27;9:177
pubmed: 19635127
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Jul 1;37(7):2153-2154
pubmed: 32343802
Bioinformatics. 2010 Nov 15;26(22):2867-73
pubmed: 20926424
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 14;114(46):E9999-E10008
pubmed: 29087343
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2012;88(10):519-35
pubmed: 23229748
BMC Genomics. 2013 Aug 19;14:563
pubmed: 23957668
Am J Bot. 2014 Oct;101(10):1770-9
pubmed: 25326619
Genetics. 2008 Oct;180(2):977-93
pubmed: 18780740
Cell. 2006 Dec 29;127(7):1309-21
pubmed: 17190597
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Nov 11;17(11):
pubmed: 27845739
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500