Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk Reducing Mastectomy in Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
Breast neoplasms
Endocrine prevention
Genetics
High-risk lesions
Risk-reducing surgery
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
09
08
2023
accepted:
22
10
2023
medline:
17
11
2023
pubmed:
17
11
2023
entrez:
16
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Primary prevention of breast cancer in women at elevated risk includes several strategies such as endocrine prevention and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). The objective of this study was to evaluate awareness of different preventive strategies across high-risk subgroups. Women referred for high risk evaluation between 2020 and 2023 completed an initial risk-assessment questionnaire that included questions around perceived lifetime risk and consideration of preventive strategies. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences across different high-risk subgroups. 482 women with a median age of 43 years (20-79 years) met inclusion criteria; 183 (38.0%) germline pathogenic variant carriers (GPV), 90 (18.7%) with high-risk lesions (HRL) on breast biopsy, and 209 (43.4%) with strong family history (FH) without a known genetic predisposition. Most high-risk women reported that they had considered increased screening and surveillance (83.7%) and lifestyle strategies (80.6%), while fewer patients had considered RRM (39.8%) and endocrine prevention (27.0%). Prior to initial consultation, RRM was more commonly considered in GPV carriers (59.4%) relative to those with HRL (33.3%) or strong FH (26.3%, p < 0.001). Based on current guidelines, 206 (43%) patients were deemed eligible for endocrine prevention, including 80.5% with HRL and 39.0% with strong FH. Prior consideration of endocrine prevention was highest in patients with HRL and significantly lower in those with strong FH (47.2% HRL versus 31.1% GPV versus 18.7% FH, p = 0.001). Endocrine prevention is the least considered preventive option for high-risk women, despite eligibility in a significant proportion of those presenting with HRL or strong FH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37973648
doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14566-1
pii: 10.1245/s10434-023-14566-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
ID : 309854
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Références
Brenner D, Poirier A, Smith L, et al. Members of the Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee Analytic leads Additional analysis Project management. 2021.
Gao C, Polley EC, Hart SN, et al. Risk of breast cancer among carriers of pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes varies by polygenic risk score. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(23):2564. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01992 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01992
pubmed: 34101481
pmcid: 8330969
Moskowitz CS, Chou JF, Wolden SL, et al. Breast cancer after chest radiation therapy for childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(21):2217. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4601 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.4601
pubmed: 24752044
pmcid: 4100937
Schnitt SJ. Benign breast disease and breast cancer risk: Morphology and beyond. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(6):836–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200306000-00017 .
doi: 10.1097/00000478-200306000-00017
pubmed: 12766590
Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips KA. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat Rev Cancer 2020 208. 2020;20(8):417-436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: Recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3):408–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACR.2017.11.034 .
doi: 10.1016/J.JACR.2017.11.034
pubmed: 29371086
Harvie M, Howell A, Evans DG. Can diet and lifestyle prevent breast cancer: What is the evidence? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2015;35:e66–73. https://doi.org/10.14694/edbook_am.2015.35.e66 .
doi: 10.14694/edbook_am.2015.35.e66
McKenzie F, Ferrari P, Freisling H, et al. Healthy lifestyle and risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women in the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(11):2640–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJC.29315 .
doi: 10.1002/IJC.29315
pubmed: 25379993
Ahrendt GM, Arun BK, Colditz GA, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2023 Breast cancer risk reduction continue NCCN guidelines panel disclosures. 2022. https://www.nccn.org/home/member -. Accessed February 27, 2023.
Ludwig KK, Neuner J, Butler A, Geurts JL, Kong AL. Risk reduction and survival benefit of prophylactic surgery in BRCA mutation carriers, a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):660–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2016.06.010 .
doi: 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2016.06.010
pubmed: 27649974
Hagen AI, Mæhle L, Vedå N, et al. Risk reducing mastectomy, breast reconstruction and patient satisfaction in Norwegian BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The Breast. 2014;23(1):38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BREAST.2013.10.002 .
doi: 10.1016/J.BREAST.2013.10.002
pubmed: 24210736
Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, et al. Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9354):296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12342-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12342-2
pubmed: 12559863
Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, et al. Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): Long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10218):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32955-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32955-1
pubmed: 31839281
pmcid: 6961114
Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, et al. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2381–91. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1103507 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1103507
pubmed: 21639806
Visvanathan K, Fabian CJ, Bantug E, et al. Use of endocrine therapy for breast cancer risk reduction: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(33):3152–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01472 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01472
pubmed: 31479306
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Terry MB, Liao Y, Whittemore AS, et al. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: A validation study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(4):504–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30902-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30902-1
pubmed: 30799262
Braun D, Yang J, Griffin M, Parmigiani G, Hughes KS. A clinical decision support tool to predict cancer risk for commonly tested cancer-related germline mutations. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(5):1187–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10897-018-0238-4/FIGURES/3 .
doi: 10.1007/S10897-018-0238-4/FIGURES/3
pubmed: 29500626
pmcid: 6240422
Watson M, Lloyd S, Davidson J, et al. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(5–6):868. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.BJC.6690139 .
doi: 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6690139
pubmed: 10070883
pmcid: 2362694
Rutherford EJ, Kelly J, Lehane EA, et al. Health literacy and the perception of risk in a breast cancer family history clinic. Surg. 2018;16(2):82–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURGE.2016.06.003 .
doi: 10.1016/J.SURGE.2016.06.003
Abittan B, Pachtman S, Herman S, Indelicato J, Herman J. Perception of breast cancer risk in over 11,000 patients during routine mammography exam. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35(4):782–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13187-019-01530-5/TABLES/2 .
doi: 10.1007/S13187-019-01530-5/TABLES/2
pubmed: 31062279
Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012
Tilburt JC, James KM, Sinicrope PS, et al. Factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: A systematic review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2011 91. 2011;9(1):1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-9-2
Altschuler A, Somkin CP. Women’s decision making about whether or not to use breast cancer chemoprevention. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v41n02_06 .
doi: 10.1300/J013v41n02_06
Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT. Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3090. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8077 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8077
pubmed: 20458026
pmcid: 2903338
Smith SG, Sestak I, Forster A, et al. Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):575–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNONC/MDV590 .
doi: 10.1093/ANNONC/MDV590
pubmed: 26646754
Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, et al. Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: Responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009 1193. 2009;119(3):613-620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10549-009-0618-4
Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Stempel M, et al. Chemoprevention uptake for breast cancer risk reduction varies by risk factor. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07236-8 .
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07236-8
Metcalfe K, Eisen A, Senter L, et al. International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Br J Cancer 2019 1211. 2019;121(1):15-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0446-1
Wong SM, Freedman RA, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry WT, Golshan M. growing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy despite no improvement in long-term survival for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):581–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698
pubmed: 28169929
Evans DG, Gandhi A, Wisely J, et al. Uptake of bilateral-risk-reducing-mastectomy: Prospective analysis of 7195 women at high-risk of breast cancer. The Breast. 2021;60:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BREAST.2021.08.015 .
doi: 10.1016/J.BREAST.2021.08.015
pubmed: 34464846
pmcid: 8406355
Neuburger J, MacNeill F, Jeevan R, Van Der Meulen JHP, Cromwell DA. Trends in the use of bilateral mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: Retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003179. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2013-003179 .
doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2013-003179
pubmed: 23906951
pmcid: 3733300
Macdonald C, Saunders CM, Keogh LA, et al. Breast cancer chemoprevention: use and views of Australian women and their clinicians. Cancer Prev Res. 2021;14(1):131–44. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0369 .
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0369