Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium: Our Approach Using Tutopatch

Acellular dermal matrix Animal product Biomaterial Bovine pericardium Breast reconstruction Breast surgery Oncoplastic surgery Tutomesh® Tutopatch® Xenograft

Journal

Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 24 08 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 17 11 2023
entrez: 16 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To describe the usage and advantages of bovine pericardium mesh (Tutopatch Our study involved a single-center, retrospective analysis of 103 patients (comprising 114 breasts) who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using bovine pericardium bovine matrix. The procedures were performed by the same surgical team between April 2018 and May 2023. The rates of early and late complications were examined after a median follow-up period of 30.2 ± 5.5 months. The results revealed that the rates of early complications stood at 9.7%, while late complications were observed in 14.5% of the cases. The most common late complication was seroma formation (7.7%) which six were resolved without any surgical intervention. Tutopatch This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Identifiants

pubmed: 37973674
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1
pii: 10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Références

Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ, Koller J, Dragúňová J, Varga I (2018) What happens to an acellular dermal matrix after implantation in the human body? A histological and electron microscopic study. Eur J Histochem EJH 62(1):2873. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2018.2873
doi: 10.4081/ejh.2018.2873 pubmed: 29569868
Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23(2):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9
doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9 pubmed: 26438439
Scheflan M, Colwell AS (2014) Tissue reinforcement in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(8):e192. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000140
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000140 pubmed: 25426375 pmcid: 4236353
Castagnetti F, Bertani C, Foroni M, Falco G, Cenini E, De Bonis F, Ferrari G (2020) The bovine pericardium matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(6):2051–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z
doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z
Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP (2019) Matrices dermiques acellulaires et matrices synthétiques: évolution des pratiques en reconstruction mammaire immédiate par prothèse [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: current concepts]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 47(3):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010 pubmed: 30738819
Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, Connor CM, Jovanovic B, Khan SA, Fine N, Rawlani V (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6 pubmed: 22186498
Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas
doi: 10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9 pubmed: 23002328 pmcid: 3443340
Quah GS, French JR, Cocco A, Hsu J, Meybodi F, Elder E (2019) Veritas in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher complications compared with TiLOOP. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(12):e2533. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002533
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002533 pubmed: 32537291 pmcid: 7288872
Semprini G, Cattin F, De Biasio F, Cedolini C, Parodi PC (2012) The bovine pericardial patch in breast reconstruction: a case report. G Chir 33(11–12):392–394
pubmed: 23140923
Eichler C, Efremova J, Brunnert K, Kurbacher CM, Gluz O, Puppe J, Warm M (2017) A head to head comparison between SurgiMend
Gubitosi A, Docimo G, Parmeggiani D, Pirozzi R, Vitiello C, Schettino P, Avellino M, Casalino G, Amato M, Ruggiero R, Docimo L (2014) Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 1):S205–S208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.007
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.007 pubmed: 24859403
Paprottka FJ, Krezdorn N, Sorg H, Könneker S, Bontikous S, Robertson I, Schlett CL, Dohse NK, Hebebrand D (2017) Evaluation of complication rates after breast surgery using acellular dermal matrix: median follow-up of three years. Plast Surg Int 2017:1283735. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1283735
doi: 10.1155/2017/1283735 pubmed: 28695010 pmcid: 5485347
Bernardini R, Varvaras D, D’Amico F, Bielli A, Scioli MG, Coniglione F, Rossi P, Buonomo OC, Petrella G, Mattei M, Orlandi A (2020) Biological acellular pericardial mesh regulated tissue integration and remodeling in a rat model of breast prosthetic implantation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 108(2):577–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34413
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34413
de Bruin AF, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E (2012) Local application of gentamicin-containing collagen implant in the prophylaxis of surgical site infection following gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Surg 10(Suppl 1):S21–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.014
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.014 pubmed: 22659224
Mofid MM (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):77S-84S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11418201
doi: 10.1177/1090820X11418201 pubmed: 21908826
Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6 pubmed: 22094736
Stump A, Holton LH 3rd, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP (2009) The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab112d
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab112d pubmed: 19568048
Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90 pubmed: 20124828
Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ (2010) Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a pubmed: 20517083
Jansen LA, Macadam SA (2011) The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2232–2244. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c56
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c56 pubmed: 21617458
Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L (2011) Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233 pubmed: 21228744
Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Pöppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schwarze H, Füchtmeier B (2007) Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000264398.85652.9a
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000264398.85652.9a pubmed: 17572576
Rosato RM, Dowden RV (1994) Radiation therapy as a cause of capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 32(4):342–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199404000-00002
doi: 10.1097/00000637-199404000-00002 pubmed: 8210149
Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS, Malata CM, Wishart GC, Wilson CB (2009) Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 90(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.023
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.023
Oray BN, Kelly S, Konobeck T, Lambert A, Mooradian DL (2009) Novel propylene oxide-treated bovine pericardium as soft tissue repair material and potential scaffold for tissue engineering. Surg Technol Int 18:47–54
pubmed: 19579189
Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006 pubmed: 21435917 pmcid: 3782991
Qing-Qing Q, Rasa Z, Rebecca WA, Amanda E (2014) In vitro and ın vivo comparison of Tutopatch™ bovine pericardium and Veritas
van Tuil C, Saxena AK, Willital GH (2006) Experience with management of anterior abdominal wall defects using bovine pericard. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 10(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0037-3
doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0037-3
Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 11(10):1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8
doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8
RTI Surgical (2023) Donor screening & eligibility. Available at: https://www.rtix.com/en_us/operational-excellence/patient-safety/donor-screening-eligibility , Accessed July 27, 2023
Fung L, Wong B, Ravichandiran K, Agur A, Rindlisbacher T, Elmaraghy A (2009) Three-dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture. Clin Anat 22(4):500–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20784
doi: 10.1002/ca.20784 pubmed: 19291757

Auteurs

Atilla Adnan Eyuboglu (AA)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Arel University Faculty of Medicine, Bahcelievler Memorial Hospital, Bahcelievler Mah. Adnan Kahveci Bulvari no: 227, 34180, Bahcelievler, Istanbul, Turkey. atillaeyuboglu@yahoo.com.

Ovunc Akdemir (O)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Fatih Aydogan (F)

Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Bahcelievler Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Mustafa Tonguc Isken (MT)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Bahcelievler Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH