Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study.
Cardiac surgical procedures
Fascial plane blocks
Heart surgical procedure
Median sternotomy
Nerve blocks
Parasternal blocks
Postsurgical pain
Journal
Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
ISSN: 2731-3786
Titre abrégé: J Anesth Analg Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918591885906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2023
16 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
12
06
2023
accepted:
08
11
2023
medline:
17
11
2023
pubmed:
17
11
2023
entrez:
17
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively. We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction. Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group. Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.
METHODS
METHODS
We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37974241
doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2
pii: 10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2
pmc: PMC10652511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
48Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jun;35(6):1594-1602
pubmed: 33293216
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jul;46(7):571-580
pubmed: 34145070
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jan;35(1):130-136
pubmed: 32798166
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt A):2313-2321
pubmed: 34696966
JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):755-766
pubmed: 31054241
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 12;9:CD003587
pubmed: 27616189
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Mar;87(3):381-382
pubmed: 33054024
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Sep;45(8):940-4
pubmed: 11576043
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Nov;36(11):4173-4182
pubmed: 35995636
Thorax. 2010 Sep;65(9):815-8
pubmed: 20805178
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):175
pubmed: 34157970
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Mar;35(3):896-903
pubmed: 32798172
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Nov;34(11):2996-3003
pubmed: 32665179
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Apr;45(4):316-317
pubmed: 31964853
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Sep;20(3):205-12
pubmed: 25900900
Local Reg Anesth. 2021 Nov 12;14:145-152
pubmed: 34803399
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):233-234
pubmed: 34188654
Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):271-82
pubmed: 21239975
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):388
pubmed: 26079353
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 29;22(1):409
pubmed: 36581838
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jan;35(1):116-122
pubmed: 32859487
J Card Surg. 2022 Jul;37(7):2115-2119
pubmed: 35254689
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Apr;43(3):263-309
pubmed: 29561531
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Oct 1;40(10):758-768
pubmed: 37501517
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Feb;36(2):483-488
pubmed: 34148801
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):671-678
pubmed: 33990437
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):198-200
pubmed: 24396082
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Aug;91(2):214-7
pubmed: 12878620
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Sep;45(8):935-9
pubmed: 11576042
Anesthesiology. 2011 Feb;114(2):262-70
pubmed: 21239976