A Clinicopathological Study of OSMF to Evaluate the Response After Treatment with Intralesional Steroid Versus Intralesional Steroid Plus Hyaluronidase.

Burning sensation Histopathological grading OSMF Oral submucous fibrosis Pain

Journal

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 15 05 2023
accepted: 31 05 2023
pmc-release: 01 12 2024
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 17 11 2023
entrez: 17 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic debilitating and a well-recognized potentially malignant condition of the oral cavity, sometimes involving oropharynx associated with trismus and burning sensation. Apart from medical management and counselling, local injection of hyaluronidase mixed with triamcinolone acetonide has been used at our centre for the last 20 years with satisfactory clinical results and without any significant side effects. The problem with the treatment was that the doses and duration of treatment has not been standardized. Therefore, in this study, authors aim to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Triamcinolone alone versus Triamcinolone acetonide plus Hyaluronidase at weekly interval and improvement in Clinical and Histopathological staging of disease after 6 weeks of treatment. This study was conducted in Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head Neck Surgery, with a total sample of 80 participants divided into two Groups, group A received Inj. Triamcinolone acetonide and group B received Inj. Triamcinolone Acetonide and Hyaluronidase 1500 IU at weekly interval. Pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical and histopathological profile of the patients were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 16 software. According to pre-treatment status, the proportion of clinical grades I, II and III were found in proportion 12.5%, 18.8% and 15.0% respectively. No significant difference was found in proportion of various grades between the groups (p = 0.388). At post treatment, the grading was reduced with changed proportion of grades I, II and III cases as 33.8%, 41.3% and 7.5% respectively. There was no significant difference in proportion of various grades between the groups (p = 0.681). Further, the intragroup comparison showed significant improvement Pre to post in group A (p = 0.002), Group B (p < 0.001) and overall, as well (p < 0.001). The inj. Triamcinolone acetonide and Inj. Hyaluronidase showed a better improvement on post treatment histopathological grading although the difference between the two groups was not significant statistically.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37974707
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03930-y
pii: 3930
pmc: PMC10645688
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3057-3062

Informations de copyright

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Growth Factors. 2011 Aug;29(4):119-27
pubmed: 21591998
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979 May;47(5):453-7
pubmed: 286260
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Feb;81(2):148-50
pubmed: 8665305
Int Dent J. 1972 Dec;22(4):474-80
pubmed: 4566996
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980 Jul;50(1):40-4
pubmed: 6930600
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Feb;22(1):56-64
pubmed: 6582933
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Aug;49(8):788-91
pubmed: 2072189
J Laryngol Otol. 1985 Jan;99(1):57-9
pubmed: 3968475
Aust Dent J. 1996 Oct;41(5):294-9
pubmed: 8961601
J Oral Pathol Med. 1990 Feb;19(2):94-8
pubmed: 2341977
Indian J Med Res. 2010 May;131:665-9
pubmed: 20516538
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Oct;46(10):830-3
pubmed: 3171741
Med J Malaysia. 1981 Dec;36(4):243-5
pubmed: 7334962

Auteurs

Gaurav Kumar Goldar (GK)

Department of Head & Neck surgery, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Sangrur, Punjab India.

Hitendra Prakash Singh (HP)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Malti Kumari Maurya (MK)

Department of Pathology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Sunil Kumar (S)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Manish Chandra (M)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Abhishek Bahadur Singh (AB)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Veerendra Verma (V)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Anupam Mishra (A)

Department of Otolaryngology & Head-Neck surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Classifications MeSH