Evaluation of Improvement in Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Using Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT22) Symptom Score.
Chronic rhinosinusitis
Endoscopic sinus surgery
Maximal medical therapy
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22
Journal
Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
15
05
2023
accepted:
31
05
2023
pmc-release:
01
12
2024
medline:
17
11
2023
pubmed:
17
11
2023
entrez:
17
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) symptom score is the most widely used questionnaire due to its easy interpretation with respect to quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). It helps in deciding further treatment plan in patients with refractory CRS despite maximal medical therapy (MMT). Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is suggested in patients not responding to medical treatment. The preoperative and post-operative QOL for patients with CRS is assessed using SNOT-22. To assess SNOT-22 score change in CRS resistant to MMT. This is a longitudinal study conducted from April 2021-September 2022 included patients diagnosed to have CRS, satisfying the inclusion criteria. SNOT-22 for symptom severity assessed at the first visit, 1 week and 12 weeks and after MMT. Patients who failed MMT, posted for ESS. Post-operatively SNOT-22 symptom score re-assessed at 15 days, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months. 56 patients (male-51% and female-49%) who failed to respond to MMT included in the study. The five major troublesome symptoms nasal blockage (92.86%), need to blow nose (75%), facial pressure/pain (53.57%), post nasal discharge (51.79%), and sneezing (42.86%). The mean SNOT-22 symptom score when compared with pre-operatively (69.54 ± 8.973) and after FESS (2.09 ± 1.881) had improved significantly (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37974715
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03929-5
pii: 3929
pmc: PMC10646061
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3337-3343Informations de copyright
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interestThe Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jan;127(1):22-28
pubmed: 27377575
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):483-8
pubmed: 17882920
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Oct;7(10):945-951
pubmed: 28753732
Laryngoscope. 2022 May;132(5):933-941
pubmed: 34437720
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):1010-1016
pubmed: 30368005
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004 May;193:19-23
pubmed: 15174756
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 May;9(5):508-513
pubmed: 30597742
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1355-1365
pubmed: 30739177
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Mar 10;40:9-13
pubmed: 30962924
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May 10;3(3):169-175
pubmed: 29516063
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Nov - Dec;39(6):707-710
pubmed: 30131169
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):835-841
pubmed: 36452725
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan-Feb;79(1):54-8
pubmed: 23503908
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Jul;15(7):41
pubmed: 26143392
Allergy Asthma Proc. 1996 Sep-Oct;17(5):231-6
pubmed: 8922141
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;152(2 Suppl):S1-S39
pubmed: 25832968