Physical model of the nuclear membrane permeability mechanism.

Anionic phospholipid Electrokinetic potential Electrostatic funnel Nuclear fractions Wheat seedlings

Journal

Biophysical reviews
ISSN: 1867-2450
Titre abrégé: Biophys Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101498573

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 10 07 2023
accepted: 31 08 2023
pmc-release: 04 10 2024
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 17 11 2023
entrez: 17 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nuclear cytoplasmic transport is mediated by many receptors that recognize specific nuclear localization signals on proteins and RNA and transport these substrates through nuclear pore complexes. Facilitated diffusion through nuclear pore complexes requires the attachment of transport receptors. Despite the relatively large tunnel diameter, some even small proteins (less than 20-30 kDa), such as histones, pass through the nuclear pore complex only with transport receptors. Over several decades, considerable material has been accumulated on the structure, architecture, and amino acid composition of the proteins included in this complex and the sequence of many receptors. We consider the data available in the literature on the structure of the nuclear pore complex and possible mechanisms of nuclear-cytoplasmic transport, applying the theory of electrostatic interactions in the context of our data on changes in the electrokinetic potential of nuclei and our previously proposed physical model of the mechanism of facilitated diffusion through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). According to our data, the main contribution to the charge of the nuclear membrane is made by anionic phospholipids, which are part of both the nuclear membrane and the nuclear matrix, which creates a potential difference between them. The nuclear membrane is a four-layer phospholipid dielectric, so the potential vector can only pass through the NPC, creating an electrostatic funnel that "pulls in" the positively charged load-NLS-NTR trigger complexes. Considering the newly obtained data, an improved model of the previously proposed physical model of the mechanism of nuclear-cytoplasmic transport is proposed. This model considers the contribution of electrostatic fields to the transportation speed when changing the membrane's thickness in the NPC basket at a higher load.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37974978
doi: 10.1007/s12551-023-01136-8
pii: 1136
pmc: PMC10643749
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1195-1207

Informations de copyright

© International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics (IUPAB) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Références

Biophys J. 2021 May 4;120(9):1565-1577
pubmed: 33617830
J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Jun;13(6):1059-85
pubmed: 19210577
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;18(2):73-89
pubmed: 27999437
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 Mar;23(3):239-47
pubmed: 26878241
Genome Biol. 2019 Apr 30;20(1):87
pubmed: 31039799
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020 Oct;64:152-159
pubmed: 32810798
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 22;375(1801):20190405
pubmed: 32362250
Nucleus. 2023 Dec;14(1):2178201
pubmed: 36794966
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 Oct;2(10):a000562
pubmed: 20630994
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018 Oct;1860(10):2042-2063
pubmed: 29501601
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):796-800
pubmed: 32879490
EMBO J. 2019 Aug 15;38(16):e101379
pubmed: 31267591
Plant Physiol. 2019 Apr;179(4):1315-1329
pubmed: 30696746
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 10;12:673905
pubmed: 34177991
Eukaryot Cell. 2015 Dec;14(12):1217-27
pubmed: 26432634
J Cell Biol. 2017 Nov 6;216(11):3609-3624
pubmed: 28864541
J Plant Physiol. 2019 Feb;233:20-30
pubmed: 30576929
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Apr 30;12:674209
pubmed: 33995467
FEBS Lett. 2018 Feb;592(4):475-488
pubmed: 29119545
Cells. 2022 Jan 29;11(3):
pubmed: 35159279
Science. 2022 Jun 10;376(6598):eabl8280
pubmed: 35679404
Biophys J. 2020 Jan 7;118(1):219-231
pubmed: 31839259
New Phytol. 2018 Jul;219(1):25-30
pubmed: 28858378
Elife. 2022 Aug 24;11:
pubmed: 36000978
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jul 04;11(7):
pubmed: 36101390
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 1;13(1):5138
pubmed: 36050301
JCI Insight. 2020 Sep 17;5(18):
pubmed: 32780723
Oncogene. 2007 Feb 22;26(8):1213-21
pubmed: 16964291
EMBO J. 2018 May 2;37(9):
pubmed: 29599178
Dev Cell. 2003 Jun;4(6):775-89
pubmed: 12791264
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jul;11(7):490-501
pubmed: 20571586
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Oct;9(10):2205-24
pubmed: 20368288
Biol Cell. 2012 Feb;104(2):70-83
pubmed: 22188206
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 9;8(1):1393
pubmed: 29123120
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Nov;13(11):687-99
pubmed: 23090414
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):230-241
pubmed: 28739821
Biochem Soc Trans. 2023 Apr 26;51(2):871-886
pubmed: 37099395
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 28;12:719453
pubmed: 34394173
J Cell Sci. 2009 Mar 1;122(Pt 5):577-86
pubmed: 19225124
Chromosoma. 2013 Oct;122(5):415-29
pubmed: 23736899
EMBO J. 2001 Mar 15;20(6):1320-30
pubmed: 11250898
Open Biol. 2021 Nov;11(11):210250
pubmed: 34814743
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 17;12:645218
pubmed: 33679862
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D503-D508
pubmed: 29106588
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Feb 26;49(4):1840-1858
pubmed: 33444439
Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 07;12:670306
pubmed: 34025705
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 23;108(34):14348-53
pubmed: 21825141
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 20;11(1):5914
pubmed: 33219233
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Apr 29;5:166
pubmed: 24808902
Arabidopsis Book. 2010;8:e0139
pubmed: 22303264
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 18;13(1):6172
pubmed: 36257947
Biophys J. 2008 Sep 15;95(6):2636-46
pubmed: 18515396
Front Genet. 2015 Mar 19;6:95
pubmed: 25852741
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Aug;68:27-33
pubmed: 28579449
Trends Biochem Sci. 2021 Jul;46(7):595-607
pubmed: 33563541
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2012 Aug;201(3):381-7
pubmed: 22628116
Cells. 2021 Jun 07;10(6):
pubmed: 34200500
Commun Integr Biol. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):220-2
pubmed: 22808339
Front Physiol. 2019 Jul 12;10:896
pubmed: 31354529
F1000Res. 2019 Apr 3;8:
pubmed: 31001417
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018 Jun;52:30-42
pubmed: 29414591
Mol Biol Cell. 2022 May 1;33(5):ar35
pubmed: 35293775
Cells. 2022 Apr 25;11(9):
pubmed: 35563762
FEBS Lett. 2019 Sep;593(17):2428-2451
pubmed: 31365767
J Integr Plant Biol. 2016 Jul;58(7):669-78
pubmed: 26564029
Cell Commun Signal. 2021 May 22;19(1):60
pubmed: 34022911
J Cell Sci. 2016 Dec 15;129(24):4439-4447
pubmed: 27856507
Nat Rev Neurol. 2022 Jun;18(6):348-362
pubmed: 35488039
Mol Plant. 2017 Oct 9;10(10):1334-1348
pubmed: 28943325
Science. 2022 Jun 10;376(6598):eabm9326
pubmed: 35679401
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 Mar 5;510(2):236-241
pubmed: 30685087
J Mol Biol. 2016 May 22;428(10 Pt A):2025-39
pubmed: 26519791
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 27;12:804928
pubmed: 35154196
Cell. 2006 Jun 16;125(6):1041-53
pubmed: 16777596
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018;94(7):259-274
pubmed: 30078827
Protein J. 2019 Aug;38(4):363-376
pubmed: 31410705
J Mol Biol. 2016 May 22;428(10 Pt A):2060-90
pubmed: 26523678
Science. 2014 Nov 7;346(6210):751-5
pubmed: 25236469
J Exp Bot. 2015 Mar;66(6):1641-7
pubmed: 25711706
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 27;20(10):
pubmed: 31137762
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022 May;23(5):307-328
pubmed: 35058649
Traffic. 2020 Oct;21(10):622-635
pubmed: 32734712
Science. 2022 Jun 10;376(6598):eabm9129
pubmed: 35679405
J Cell Sci. 2017 Feb 1;130(3):590-601
pubmed: 28049722
Cell. 2022 Jan 20;185(2):361-378.e25
pubmed: 34982960
J Cell Biol. 2003 Aug 4;162(3):391-401
pubmed: 12885761
Plant Cell. 2019 May;31(5):1141-1154
pubmed: 30914470
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Dec 05;13:200
pubmed: 24308514
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Jan;14(1):13-24
pubmed: 23212477
J Cell Biol. 2014 Apr 28;205(2):133-41
pubmed: 24751535
Trends Cell Biol. 2005 Mar;15(3):121-4
pubmed: 15752974
Nat Plants. 2022 Aug;8(8):940-953
pubmed: 35915144
Dev Cell. 2015 May 4;33(3):285-98
pubmed: 25942622
Cell. 2018 Jun 28;174(1):202-217.e9
pubmed: 29958108
Virol J. 2019 Apr 5;16(1):45
pubmed: 30953524
Nucleus. 2020 Dec;11(1):347-363
pubmed: 33295233
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Oct;10(5):483-9
pubmed: 17709277
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 14;120(7):e2212874120
pubmed: 36757893
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017 Apr 28;68:139-172
pubmed: 28226231
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 11;24(2):
pubmed: 36674958
Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Mar 15;32(6):467-469
pubmed: 33720780
Chem Rec. 2021 Jun;21(6):1430-1441
pubmed: 33502100
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 09;10:1639
pubmed: 31998332
Biophys J. 2014 Sep 16;107(6):1393-402
pubmed: 25229147
J Cell Biol. 2002 Sep 2;158(5):915-27
pubmed: 12196509
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8527-9
pubmed: 3866238
J Cell Sci. 2015 Jun 1;128(11):2021-32
pubmed: 25918123
Cell Tissue Res. 2017 Apr;368(1):105-114
pubmed: 27834018
Genome Res. 2017 Jul;27(7):1162-1173
pubmed: 28385710
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014 Jun;28:61-8
pubmed: 24694724
Genes Dev. 2008 Apr 1;22(7):832-53
pubmed: 18381888
Trends Cell Biol. 2018 Jan;28(1):34-45
pubmed: 28893461

Auteurs

Liya A Minasbekyan (LA)

Scientific Research Institute of Biology, Yerevan State University, A. Manoogian St., 1, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia.

Hamlet G Badalyan (HG)

Chair of General Physics, Yerevan State University, A. Manoogian St., 1, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia.

Classifications MeSH