Visible Cash, a Second Incentive, and Priority Mail? An Experimental Evaluation of Mailing Strategies for a Screening Questionnaire in a National Push-to-Web/Mail Survey.

Incentive Mailing strategy Priority Mail Push-to-web survey Respondent composition Response rate

Journal

Journal of survey statistics and methodology
ISSN: 2325-0984
Titre abrégé: J Surv Stat Methodol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101630209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 22 02 2024
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 17 11 2023
entrez: 17 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In push-to-web surveys that use postal mail to contact sampled cases, participation is contingent on the mail being opened and the survey invitations being delivered. The design of the mailings is crucial to the success of the survey. We address the question of how to design invitation mailings that can grab potential respondents' attention and sway them to be interested in the survey in a short window of time. In the household screening stage of a national survey, the American Family Health Study, we experimentally tested three mailing design techniques for recruiting respondents: (1) a visible cash incentive in the initial mailing, (2) a second incentive for initial nonrespondents, and (3) use of Priority Mail in the nonresponse follow-up mailing. We evaluated the three techniques' overall effects on response rates as well as how they differentially attracted respondents with different characteristics. We found that all three techniques were useful in increasing the screening response rates, but there was little evidence that they had differential effects on sample subgroups that could help to reduce nonresponse biases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37975065
doi: 10.1093/jssam/smac041
pii: smac041
pmc: PMC10646700
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1011-1031

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Public Opin Q. 2000 Fall;64(3):299-308
pubmed: 11114270
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 7;24(1):e26299
pubmed: 34994701
Field methods. 2022;34(1):3-19
pubmed: 35360526
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2022 Jul 12;11(1):124-140
pubmed: 36714299

Auteurs

Shiyu Zhang (S)

is a PhD candidate, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Brady T West (BT)

is a Research Associate Professor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

James Wagner (J)

is a Research Professor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Mick P Couper (MP)

is a Research Professor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Rebecca Gatward (R)

is a Survey Director, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

William G Axinn (WG)

is a Research Professor at the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Classifications MeSH