Deferred cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Dec 2023
09 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
29
09
2023
revised:
30
10
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
pubmed:
18
11
2023
medline:
18
11
2023
entrez:
17
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51-0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44-1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59-1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality. This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51-0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44-1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59-1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37977169
pii: S0140-6736(23)02468-6
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02468-6
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2209-2222Investigateurs
Anna Lene Seidler
(AL)
Mason Aberoumand
(M)
Kylie E Hunter
(KE)
Angie Barba
(A)
Sol Libesman
(S)
Jonathan G Williams
(JG)
Nipun Shrestha
(N)
Jannik Aagerup
(J)
James X Sotiropoulos
(JX)
Alan A Montgomery
(AA)
Gillian M L Gyte
(GML)
Aashim Garg
(A)
Aditi Kumar
(A)
Aidan C Tan
(AC)
Amir Kugelman
(A)
Angela C Webster
(AC)
Anu A George
(AA)
Anu Thukral
(A)
Anup C Katheria
(AC)
Arjan B Te Pas
(AB)
Ashish Kc
(A)
Berndt Urlesberger
(B)
Bernhard Schwaberger
(B)
Carl H Backes
(CH)
Catalina De Paco Matallana
(C)
Chamnan Tanprasertkul
(C)
Chayatat Ruangkit
(C)
Deepak Chawla
(D)
Douglas A Blank
(DA)
Emel Okulu
(E)
Eugene M Dempsey
(EM)
Govindu Ram Mohan
(G)
Graeme R Polglase
(GR)
Guillermo Carroli
(G)
Heidi K Al-Wassia
(HK)
Heike Rabe
(H)
Helen G Liley
(HG)
Hytham Atia
(H)
Islam Nour
(I)
Jiang-Qin Liu
(JQ)
John Kattwinkel
(J)
Jon S Dorling
(JS)
Judith S Mercer
(JS)
Justin B Josephsen
(JB)
Karen D Fairchild
(KD)
Kedra Wallace
(K)
Kellie E Murphy
(KE)
Kristy P Robledo
(KP)
Manizheh M Gharehbaghi
(MM)
Margarita de Veciana
(M)
Maria Goya
(M)
Martin Kluckow
(M)
Melissa I March
(MI)
Michael P Meyer
(MP)
Mukul K Mangla
(MK)
Nahed E Allam
(NE)
Nehad Nasef
(N)
Niraj K Dipak
(NK)
Ola Andersson
(O)
Peter G Davis
(PG)
Pharuhad Pongmee
(P)
Richard D Riley
(RD)
Robert John Simes
(RJ)
Ronny Knol
(R)
Saadet Arsan
(S)
Shashank Shekhar
(S)
Sheila S Belk
(SS)
Shigeharu Hosono
(S)
Shiraz Badurdeen
(S)
Simone Pratesi
(S)
Sofia Dias
(S)
Stuart B Hooper
(SB)
Tanushree Sahoo
(T)
Thomas P A Debray
(TPA)
Varanattu C Manoj
(VC)
Venkataseshan Sundaram
(V)
Victor Lago
(V)
Vikram Datta
(V)
Walid El-Naggar
(W)
Waldemar A Carlo
(WA)
William O Tarnow-Mordi
(WO)
Lelia Duley
(L)
Lisa M Askie
(LM)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests iCOMP trial representatives comprised principal investigators of studies included in this meta-analysis. Trial representatives did not have input on study eligibility, data integrity assessments, data extraction, or risk of bias assessments for their own studies. Trial representatives did not make final decisions on certainty of evidence ratings. ALS is a recipient of Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project and investigator grants (funds paid directly to the University of Sydney). JXS reports travel grants and scholarships from the Association of Interdisciplinary Meta-science and Open-Science, Pediatric Academic Societies, and the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand. KEH is a recipient of NHMRC funding paid directly to the University of Sydney. The full list of iCOMP Collaborators and their declaration of interests are noted in the appendix (pp 371–374). All other authors have no competing interests.