Prognosis of Gleason Score 9-10 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Needle Biopsies: A Nationwide Population-based Study.

Gleason grade Mortality Needle biopsy Prostate cancer

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 21 09 2023
revised: 13 10 2023
accepted: 02 11 2023
medline: 18 11 2023
pubmed: 18 11 2023
entrez: 17 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Since 2014, prostate cancer is reported using five-tier grouping of Gleason scores. Studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the groups. We assessed the risk of prostate cancer death for men diagnosed with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 on needle biopsy in a population-based cohort. We used the data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 4.0 for a survival analysis. Among 199 620 men reported to have prostate cancer in 2000-2020, 172 112 were diagnosed on needle biopsy. The primary treatment was classified as androgen deprivation therapy (66%), deferred treatment (5%), radical prostatectomy (7%), or radical radiotherapy (21%). The risks of death from prostate cancer in men with Gleason score 9-10 at 5 and 10 yr were used as endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression models controlling for socioeconomic factors and primary treatment were used for time-to-event analyses of death from prostate cancer and death from any causes. A total of 20 419 (12%) men had a Gleason score of 9-10, including Gleason scores of 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 in 14 333 (70%), 4223 (21%), and 1863 (9%) men, respectively. The risks of prostate cancer death for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr of follow-up were 0.45 (confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.46), 0.56 (0.55-0.58), and 0.66 (0.63-0.68), respectively. The risks of death of any cause for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr were 0.73 (CI 0.72-0.74), 0.81 (0.80-0.83), and 0.87 (0.85-0.89), respectively. We demonstrate in the largest and most complete cohort analyzed to date that collapsing the Gleason scores by grouping results in loss of prognostic information in men with Gleason score 9-10 cancer. Survival of prostate cancer patients with the highest tumor grades varies depending on grade composition.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Since 2014, prostate cancer is reported using five-tier grouping of Gleason scores. Studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the groups.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We assessed the risk of prostate cancer death for men diagnosed with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 on needle biopsy in a population-based cohort.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
We used the data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 4.0 for a survival analysis. Among 199 620 men reported to have prostate cancer in 2000-2020, 172 112 were diagnosed on needle biopsy. The primary treatment was classified as androgen deprivation therapy (66%), deferred treatment (5%), radical prostatectomy (7%), or radical radiotherapy (21%).
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
The risks of death from prostate cancer in men with Gleason score 9-10 at 5 and 10 yr were used as endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression models controlling for socioeconomic factors and primary treatment were used for time-to-event analyses of death from prostate cancer and death from any causes.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
A total of 20 419 (12%) men had a Gleason score of 9-10, including Gleason scores of 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 in 14 333 (70%), 4223 (21%), and 1863 (9%) men, respectively. The risks of prostate cancer death for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr of follow-up were 0.45 (confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.46), 0.56 (0.55-0.58), and 0.66 (0.63-0.68), respectively. The risks of death of any cause for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr were 0.73 (CI 0.72-0.74), 0.81 (0.80-0.83), and 0.87 (0.85-0.89), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrate in the largest and most complete cohort analyzed to date that collapsing the Gleason scores by grouping results in loss of prognostic information in men with Gleason score 9-10 cancer.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
Survival of prostate cancer patients with the highest tumor grades varies depending on grade composition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37978024
pii: S2588-9311(23)00244-4
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lars Egevad (L)

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: lars.egevad@ki.se.

Chiara Micoli (C)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Hemamali Samaratunga (H)

Aquesta Uropathology and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Brett Delahunt (B)

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Hans Garmo (H)

Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Pär Stattin (P)

Department of Surgical Sciences Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Martin Eklund (M)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH