Twelve Month Efficacy of Computer-Tailored Communication in Boosting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adults Aged Forty and over: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Behavior (mesh) Computer-Tailored Communication (CTC) Diet (mesh) Dietary Surveys (mesh) Fruit (mesh) and Vegetables (mesh) Intake Multi-Level Analysis (mesh) aged (mesh) middle age (mesh) nutrition (mesh)

Journal

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)
ISSN: 2156-5376
Titre abrégé: Adv Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101540874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 14 07 2023
revised: 29 09 2023
accepted: 03 11 2023
pubmed: 19 11 2023
medline: 19 11 2023
entrez: 18 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Computer-tailored health communication (CTC) can enhance fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and, consequently, health by providing personalized feedback. However, few studies have examined the long-term effects of such interventions in middle-aged and older adults. This research aimed to assess the 12-mo efficacy of CTC in promoting F&V consumption and potentially identify who among middle-aged and older adults changed their diet after the intervention. The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 2021-12-09, code CRD42022330491. The research was performed without external funding. We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CTC interventions for increasing F&V intake with usual care/no intervention control in adults aged ≥40, measured 12 mo after the pretest. The search covered the period from 1 January 1990 to 1 January 2022. We selected 16 RCTs with 25,496 baseline participants for the review systematic literature reviews (SLR) and 11 RCTs with 19 measurements for the meta-analysis (MA). We assessed risk of bias with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The SLR revealed that at 1-y postCTC intervention, most of the treatment groups increased F&V intake more than the control groups. The overall bias in the data set was not high. The MA model on 11 RCTs revealed a significant effect size for F&V consumption in intervention groups compared with control, standardized mean difference of 0.21 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.12, 0.30), P = 0.0004. The evidence suggests that CTC is a suitable strategy for public interventions aiming to increase F&V intake in adults aged ≥40. The design of CTC for public interventions should consider the process of change and stages of change addressing awareness, attitudes, self-efficacy, and social influence as promising concepts for influencing behavior change.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37979693
pii: S2161-8313(23)01434-5
doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100150
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100150

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Andreja Misir (A)

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. Electronic address: andreja.misir@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Wolfgang Viechtbauer (W)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Hein de Vries (H)

Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Ilse Mesters (I)

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH