Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing.

ALE Antisaccade Coordinate-based meta-analysis Flanker Go/no-go Interference resolution Performance monitoring Response conflict Simon Stimulus–response compatibility Stop signal Stroop fMRI

Journal

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
ISSN: 1873-7528
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806090

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 11 05 2023
revised: 23 10 2023
accepted: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 19 11 2023
medline: 19 11 2023
entrez: 18 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37979735
pii: S0149-7634(23)00437-2
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105468
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105468

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateOf

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Edna C Cieslik (EC)

Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany. Electronic address: e.cieslik@fz-juelich.de.

Markus Ullsperger (M)

Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.

Martin Gell (M)

Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen, Germany.

Simon B Eickhoff (SB)

Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Robert Langner (R)

Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH