Efficacy and moderators of efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapies with a trauma focus in children and adolescents: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Journal
The Lancet. Child & adolescent health
ISSN: 2352-4650
Titre abrégé: Lancet Child Adolesc Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101712925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
24
03
2023
revised:
07
09
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
pubmed:
20
11
2023
medline:
20
11
2023
entrez:
19
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Existing clinical trials of cognitive behavioural therapies with a trauma focus (CBTs-TF) are underpowered to examine key variables that might moderate treatment effects. We aimed to determine the efficacy of CBTs-TF for young people, relative to passive and active control conditions, and elucidate putative individual-level and treatment-level moderators. This was an individual participant data meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised studies in young people aged 6-18 years exposed to trauma. We included studies identified by the latest UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines (completed on Jan 29, 2018) and updated their search. The search strategy included database searches restricted to publications between Jan 1, 2018, and Nov 12, 2019; grey literature search of trial registries ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN; preprint archives PsyArXiv and bioRxiv; and use of social media and emails to key authors to identify any unpublished datasets. The primary outcome was post-traumatic stress symptoms after treatment (<1 month after the final session). Predominantly, one-stage random-effects models were fitted. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019151954. We identified 38 studies; 25 studies provided individual participant data, comprising 1686 young people (mean age 13·65 years [SD 3·01]), with 802 receiving CBTs-TF and 884 a control condition. The risk-of-bias assessment indicated five studies as low risk and 20 studies with some concerns. Participants who received CBTs-TF had lower mean post-traumatic stress symptoms after treatment than those who received the control conditions, after adjusting for post-traumatic stress symptoms before treatment (b=-13·17, 95% CI -17·84 to -8·50, p<0·001, τ This is the first individual participant data meta-analysis of young people exposed to trauma. Our findings support CBTs-TF as the first-line treatment, irrespective of age, gender, trauma characteristics, or carer involvement in treatment, with particular benefits for those with higher initial distress. Swiss National Science Foundation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Existing clinical trials of cognitive behavioural therapies with a trauma focus (CBTs-TF) are underpowered to examine key variables that might moderate treatment effects. We aimed to determine the efficacy of CBTs-TF for young people, relative to passive and active control conditions, and elucidate putative individual-level and treatment-level moderators.
METHODS
METHODS
This was an individual participant data meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised studies in young people aged 6-18 years exposed to trauma. We included studies identified by the latest UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines (completed on Jan 29, 2018) and updated their search. The search strategy included database searches restricted to publications between Jan 1, 2018, and Nov 12, 2019; grey literature search of trial registries ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN; preprint archives PsyArXiv and bioRxiv; and use of social media and emails to key authors to identify any unpublished datasets. The primary outcome was post-traumatic stress symptoms after treatment (<1 month after the final session). Predominantly, one-stage random-effects models were fitted. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019151954.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
We identified 38 studies; 25 studies provided individual participant data, comprising 1686 young people (mean age 13·65 years [SD 3·01]), with 802 receiving CBTs-TF and 884 a control condition. The risk-of-bias assessment indicated five studies as low risk and 20 studies with some concerns. Participants who received CBTs-TF had lower mean post-traumatic stress symptoms after treatment than those who received the control conditions, after adjusting for post-traumatic stress symptoms before treatment (b=-13·17, 95% CI -17·84 to -8·50, p<0·001, τ
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first individual participant data meta-analysis of young people exposed to trauma. Our findings support CBTs-TF as the first-line treatment, irrespective of age, gender, trauma characteristics, or carer involvement in treatment, with particular benefits for those with higher initial distress.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
Swiss National Science Foundation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37980918
pii: S2352-4642(23)00253-5
doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00253-5
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
28-39Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests RM-S received personal payment for teaching on the delivery of cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder for children and young people at various UK universities and training bodies, and he is an unpaid council member of the UK Trauma Council. EBF received payment for contributing to a post-traumatic stress disorder manual and workbook and for post-traumatic stress disorder workshops, lectures, and meetings. JDF served as a consultant for Advanced Trauma Solutions Professionals. SK received minor side income from lecturing in a clinical training program for Narrative Exposure Therapy (University of Turku, Turku, Finland). PS received a share of royalties from Routledge publishers from publication of a cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder manual for young people; he was an unpaid member of the research committee of the Children and War Foundation (a non-profit based in Norway) and an unpaid trustee of the Children and War UK (a non-profit based in the UK). CHi received personal payment for writing an article regarding treatment of therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in preschool-aged children from the Aeon Media Group. TD received personal payment for teaching on the delivery of cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder for children and young people at various UK universities and training bodies. All other authors declare no competing interests.