Robust Radiomic Feature Selection in Digital Mammography: Understanding the Effect of Imaging Acquisition Physics Using Phantom and Clinical Data Analysis.
Anthropomorphic Phantom
Breast Cancer
Digital Mammography
Radiomics
Risk Assessment
Robustness
Journal
Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
ISSN: 0277-786X
Titre abrégé: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524122
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
medline:
1
2
2020
pubmed:
1
2
2020
entrez:
20
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies have shown that combining calculations of radiomic features with estimates of mammographic density results in an even better assessment of breast cancer risk than density alone. However, to ensure that risk assessment calculations are consistent across different imaging acquisition settings, it is important to identify features that are not overly sensitive to changes in these settings. In this study, digital mammography (DM) images of an anthropomorphic phantom ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI) were acquired at various technique settings. We varied kV and mAs, which control contrast and noise, respectively. DM images in women with negative screening exams were also analyzed. Radiomic features were calculated in the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") DM images; i.e., grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. For each feature, the range of variation across technique settings in phantom images was calculated. This range was scaled against the range of variation in the clinical distribution (specifically, the range corresponding to the middle 90% of the distribution). In order for a radiomic feature to be considered robust, this metric of imaging acquisition variation (IAV) should be as small as possible (approaching zero). An IAV threshold of 0.25 was proposed for the purpose of this study. Out of 341 features, 284 features (83%) met the threshold IAV ≤ 0.25. In conclusion, we have developed a method to identify robust radiomic features in DM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37982014
doi: 10.1117/12.2549163
pmc: PMC10655898
mid: NIHMS1937085
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA207084
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA163313
Pays : United States
Références
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 17;5:13087
pubmed: 26278466
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169172
pubmed: 28046060
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 18;7:46349
pubmed: 28418006
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4849-4859
pubmed: 29737390
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):4903-17
pubmed: 22894417
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):011002
pubmed: 28948196
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Nov 14;2(1):36
pubmed: 30426318
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2145-2156
pubmed: 30802972
Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):550-2
pubmed: 3941885
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Apr;2(2):024501
pubmed: 26158105
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):4149-60
pubmed: 26133615
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Dec;27(6):805-23
pubmed: 24990346
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):837-45
pubmed: 19258482