Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline-infusion sonography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy.

Cesarean scar pregnancy saline infusion sonography ultrasound uterine niche uterine scar

Journal

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN: 1469-0705
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9108340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 13 11 2023
received: 25 04 2023
accepted: 15 11 2023
medline: 20 11 2023
pubmed: 20 11 2023
entrez: 20 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate cesarean scar using saline-infused sonography (SIS) in women with a history of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). A cohort of 38 non-pregnant women with a history of CSP treated with combined local and systemic methotrexate (MTX) were prospectively investigated by SIS. For purposes of analysis, they were classified according to the new Delphi Consensus Criteria for CSP in early gestation into three subgroups based on the depth of the gestational sac herniation in the sagittal plane. Subgroup A included 8 (21.1%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded towards the uterine cavity. Subgroup B included 20 (52.6%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium, and subgroup C included 10 (26.3%) cases in which the gestational was partially located outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus. All subgroup C women were revealed to have a uterine niche during SIS. The median niche length (p=0.006) and depth (p=0.015) were significantly greater in subgroup C than in subgroups A or B. The median residual myometrial thickness (RMT) was significantly lower in subgroup C than in subgroups A or B (p=0.006). Women with prior CSP who had a gestational sac protruding beyond the serosal line had a significantly greater niche length, depth and lower RMT and may contribute to individualized risk counselling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37983614
doi: 10.1002/uog.27540
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

M Pekar-Zlotin (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

R Maymon (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

M Nimrodi (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

H Zur-Naaman (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Y Melcer (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Classifications MeSH