The effect of eccentricity on visual motion prediction in peripheral vision.
peripheral vision
reaction time
time to contact
visual motion perception
Journal
Physiological reports
ISSN: 2051-817X
Titre abrégé: Physiol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101607800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
10
11
2023
received:
20
06
2023
accepted:
10
11
2023
medline:
22
11
2023
pubmed:
21
11
2023
entrez:
20
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of the current study was to clarify the effect of eccentricity on visual motion prediction using a time-to-contact (TTC) task. TTC indicates the predictive ability to accurately estimate the time-to-contact of a moving object based on visual motion perception. We also measured motion reaction time (motion RT) as an indicator of the speed of visual motion perception. The TTC task was to press a button when the moving target would arrive at the stationary goal. In the occluded condition, the target dot was occluded 500 ms before the time to contact. The motion RT task was to press a button as soon as the target moved. The visual targets were randomly presented at five different eccentricities (4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, 12°) and moved on a circular trajectory at a constant tangent velocity (8°/s) to keep the eccentricity constant. Our results showed that TTC in the occluded condition showed an earlier response as the eccentricity increased. Furthermore, the motion RT became longer as the eccentricity increased. Therefore, it is most likely that a slower speed perception in peripheral vision delays the perceived speed of motion onset and leads to an earlier response in the TTC task.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37985195
doi: 10.14814/phy2.15877
pmc: PMC10659946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15877Subventions
Organisme : JSPS
ID : 22H03492
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.
Références
Ando, S., Kida, N., & Oda, S. (2001). Central and peripheral visual reaction time of soccer players and nonathletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(3 PART 1), 786-794. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.92.3.786
Ando, S., Kida, N., & Oda, S. (2002). Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(3 PART 1), 747-751. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.747
Assad, J. A., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1995). Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 373(6514), 518-521. https://doi.org/10.1038/373518a0
Battaglini, L., Campana, G., & Casco, C. (2013). Illusory speed is retained in memory during invisible motion. Iperception, 4(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1068/I0562
Baurès, R., Balestra, M., Rosito, M., & Vanrullen, R. (2018). The detrimental influence of attention on time-to-contact perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 1591-1598. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1523-x
Baurès, R., Maquestiaux, F., Delucia, P. R., Defer, A., & Prigent, E. (2018). Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 1971-1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5273-8
Benguigui, N., Broderick, M., & Ripoll, H. (2004). Age differences in estimating arrival-time. Neuroscience Letters, 369(3), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.051
Benguigui, N., Broderick, M. P., Baurès, R., & Amorim, M. A. (2008). Motion prediction and the velocity effect in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X295146
Bennett, S. J., Baures, R., Hecht, H., & Benguigui, N. (2010). Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion. Experimental Brain Research, 206(4), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2416-y
Berlucchi, G., Heron, W., Hyman, R., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1971). Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. Brain, 94(3), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/94.3.419
Bosco, G., Carrozzo, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2008). Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(46), 12071-12084. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2869-08.2008
Churchland, A. K., Huang, X., & Lisberger, S. G. (2007). Responses of neurons in the medial superior temporal visual area to apparent motion stimuli in macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(1), 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00941.2005
Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Goulon, C., Nazarian, B., & Craig, C. (2008). Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2(SEP), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.010.2008
Daneshi, A., Azarnoush, H., Towhidkhah, F., Bernardin, D., & Faubert, J. (2020). Brain activity during time to contact estimation: An EEG study. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 14(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09563-8
Dessing, J. C., Vesia, M., & Douglas Crawford, J. (2013). The role of areas MT+/V5 and SPOC in spatial and temporal control of manual interception: An rTMS study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(FEB), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00015
Dursteler, M. R., & Wurtz, R. H. (1988). Pursuit and optokinetic deficits following chemical lesions of cortical areas MT and MST. Journal of Neurophysiology, 60(3), 941-965. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.60.3.940
Erickson, R. G., & Thier, P. (1992). Responses of direction-selective neurons in monkey cortex to self-induced visual motion. Annals of the new York Academy of Sciences, 656(1), 766-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb25255.x
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Gegenfurtner, K. R., Mayser, H., & Sharpe, L. T. (1999). Seeing movement in the dark. Nature, 398(6727), 475-476. https://doi.org/10.1038/19004
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(92), 90344-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
Hassan, O., Thompson, P., & Hammett, S. T. (2016). Perceived speed in peripheral vision can go up or down. Journal of Vision, 16(6), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.6.20
Ilg, U. J. (2008). The role of areas MT and MST in coding of visual motion underlying the execution of smooth pursuit. Vision Research, 48(20), 2062-2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.015
Jacobs, R. J. (1979). Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery. Vision Research, 19(11), 1187-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90183-4
Jovanovic, L., & Mamassian, P. (2020). Events are perceived earlier in peripheral vision. Current Biology, 30(21), R1299-R1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.096
Komatsu, H., & Wurtz, R. H. (1988). Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 60(2), 580-603. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.580
Krekelberg, B., & van Wezel, R. J. A. (2013). Neural mechanisms of speed perception: Transparent motion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(9), 2007-2018. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00333.2013
Larcombe, S. J., Kennard, C., & Bridge, H. (2018). Increase in MST activity correlates with visual motion learning: A functional MRI study of perceptual learning. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.23832
Liu, J., & Newsome, W. T. (2005). Correlation between speed perception and neural activity in the middle temporal visual area. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(3), 711-722. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4034-04.2005
Mandelbaum, J., & Sloan, L. L. (1947). Peripheral visual acuity. With special reference to scotopic illumination. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 30(5), 581-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(47)92311-8
Maunsell, J. H. R., & Van Essen, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49(5), 1127-1147. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1983.49.5.1127
Miyamoto, T., Miura, K., Kizuka, T., & Ono, S. (2020). Properties of smooth pursuit and visual motion reaction time to second-order motion stimuli. PLoS One, 15(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243430
Miyamoto, T., Numasawa, K., Hirata, Y., Katoh, A., Miura, K., & Ono, S. (2021). Effects of smooth pursuit and second-order stimuli on visual motion prediction. Physiological Reports, 9(9), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14833
Monache, S. D., Lacquaniti, F., & Bosco, G. (2017). Differential contributions to the interception of occluded ballistic trajectories by the temporoparietal junction, area hMT/V5+, and the intraparietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118(3), 1809-1823. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00068.2017
Newsome, W. T., & Pare, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 8(6), 2201-2211. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-06-02201.1988
Newsome, W. T., Wurtz, R. H., & Komatsu, H. (1988). Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 60(2), 604-620. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.604
Ono, S., Miura, K., Kawamura, T., & Kizuka, T. (2019). Asymmetric smooth pursuit eye movements and visual motion reaction time. Physiological Reports, 7(14), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14187
Ono, S., & Mustari, M. J. (2016). Response properties of MST parafoveal neurons during smooth pursuit adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(1), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00203.2016
Orban, G. A., Saunders, R. C., & Vandenbussche, E. (1995). Lesions of the superior temporal cortical motion areas impair speed discrimination in the macaque monkey. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7(11), 2261-2276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00647.x
Osaka, N. (1976). Visual reaction time as a function of target size and retinal eccentricity in the peripheral visual field. Japanese Psychological Research, 18(4), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.18.183
Osaka, N. (1978). Naso-temporal differences in human reaction time in the peripheral visual field. Neuropsychologia, 16(3), 299-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(78)90023-4
Peterken, C., Brown, B., & Bowman, K. (1991). Predicting the future position of a moving target. Perception, 20(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1068/P200005
Rovamo, J., & Virsu, V. (1979). An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37(3), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236819
Schenk, T., Ellison, A., Rice, N., & Milner, A. D. (2005). The role of V5/MT+ in the control of catching movements: An rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 43, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.006
Stone, L. S., & Thompson, P. (1992). Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision Research, 32(8), 1535-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90209-2
Tynan, P. D., & Sekuler, R. (1982). Motion processing in peripheral vision: Reaction time and perceived velocity. Vision Research, 22(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(82)90167-5
Wright, M. J., & Johnston, A. (1983). Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus. Vision Research, 23(10), 983-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(83)90008-1