Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Renal Mass Biopsy: Seeding is not Anecdotal.

Local recurrence Renal cell carcinoma Small renal masses Tumor seeding

Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2023
revised: 29 10 2023
accepted: 29 10 2023
medline: 21 11 2023
pubmed: 21 11 2023
entrez: 20 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Renal biopsy is recommended if the outcome might alter therapeutic decisions for patients who present with renal masses of unclear etiology. However, little is known about long-term risks related to this procedure. We performed a retrospective analysis of an institutional database maintained by a tertiary referral center that included patients who underwent renal biopsies between 2003 and 2005 with a follow-up of at least 15 years. Renal biopsies were taken percutaneously with a coaxial technique according to guideline recommendations and included off-line ultrasound guidance. We identified 106 patients who underwent biopsies for a renal mass of unclear etiology. The median age was 58.7 years (43.7-66.2). A median of 4.2 (3-6) biopsies were collected from each patient. Tumor seeding leading to local growth was identified in 6 patients (5,7%) after a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Four of these lesions that were resected exhibited the same histology as the original biopsy result; these patients experienced no further recurrence. In 45 patients (42%), the biopsy results led to a therapy other than surgery (n = 28 lymphoma, n = 6 metastasis from other malignancies, n = 11 oncocytoma). The remaining 61 patients (58%) were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma treated either surgically or with ablation. None of the patients developed metastatic spread related to tumor seeding. Tumor seeding after renal mass biopsy is a rare, but relevant risk associated with this procedure. As indications for renal mass biopsy increase, longer-term follow-up and improved biopsy techniques should be considered to address this complication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37985332
pii: S1558-7673(23)00231-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Michael Staehler (M)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: michael.staehler@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Severin Rodler (S)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Isabel Brinkmann (I)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Christian G Stief (CG)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Annabel Graser (A)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Melanie Götz (M)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Annika Herlemann (A)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH