A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinimetric properties of the core outcome measurement instruments for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness (CONCISE).

Adult Humans Hand Strength Critical Illness / therapy Activities of Daily Living Treatment Outcome Outcome Assessment, Health Care
(3–5) Clinimetric Core outcome set Critical illness Nutrition

Journal

Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 11 2023
Historique:
received: 14 09 2023
accepted: 09 11 2023
medline: 27 11 2023
pubmed: 21 11 2023
entrez: 21 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

CONCISE is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the clinimetric properties of these instruments and understand any limitations to ensure valid and reliable research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the measurement instruments identified in CONCISE. Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2022 (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, CINAHL via Healthcare Databases Advanced Search, CENTRAL via Cochrane). Studies were included if they examined at least one clinimetric property of a CONCISE measurement instrument or recognised variation in adults ≥ 18 years with critical illness or recovering from critical illness in any language. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures was used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in line with COSMIN guidance. The COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of clinimetric properties. Overall certainty of the evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis was performed and where possible, meta-analysis was conducted. A total of 4316 studies were screened. Forty-seven were included in the review, reporting data for 12308 participants. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score and Physical Functioning), sit-to-stand test, 6-m walk test and Barthel Index had the strongest clinimetric properties and certainty of evidence. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Katz Index and handgrip strength had less favourable results. There was limited data for Lawson Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. The risk of bias ranged from inadequate to very good. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high. Variable evidence exists to support the clinimetric properties of the CONCISE measurement instruments. We suggest using this review alongside CONCISE to guide outcome selection for future trials of nutrition and metabolic interventions in critical illness. PROSPERO (CRD42023438187). Registered 21/06/2023.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
CONCISE is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the clinimetric properties of these instruments and understand any limitations to ensure valid and reliable research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the measurement instruments identified in CONCISE.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2022 (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, CINAHL via Healthcare Databases Advanced Search, CENTRAL via Cochrane). Studies were included if they examined at least one clinimetric property of a CONCISE measurement instrument or recognised variation in adults ≥ 18 years with critical illness or recovering from critical illness in any language. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures was used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in line with COSMIN guidance. The COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of clinimetric properties. Overall certainty of the evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis was performed and where possible, meta-analysis was conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 4316 studies were screened. Forty-seven were included in the review, reporting data for 12308 participants. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score and Physical Functioning), sit-to-stand test, 6-m walk test and Barthel Index had the strongest clinimetric properties and certainty of evidence. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Katz Index and handgrip strength had less favourable results. There was limited data for Lawson Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. The risk of bias ranged from inadequate to very good. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high.
CONCLUSIONS
Variable evidence exists to support the clinimetric properties of the CONCISE measurement instruments. We suggest using this review alongside CONCISE to guide outcome selection for future trials of nutrition and metabolic interventions in critical illness.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42023438187). Registered 21/06/2023.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04729-7 PMID: 37986015 PMC: PMC10662687
pubmed: 37986015
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04729-7
pii: 10.1186/s13054-023-04729-7
pmc: PMC10662687
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

450

Subventions

Organisme : National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship Award Programme
ID : 2021-19-009
Organisme : National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Pre-Doctoral Clinical Academic Fellowship Award Programme
ID : NIHR302695

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Nutrients. 2020 Nov 30;12(12):
pubmed: 33265999
Phys Ther. 2006 Sep;86(9):1271-81
pubmed: 16959675
Clin Respir J. 2018 Oct;12(10):2475-2479
pubmed: 29931773
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 9;21(1):142
pubmed: 28599676
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1862-9
pubmed: 25319384
Crit Care. 2022 Aug 6;26(1):240
pubmed: 35933433
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Feb 05;9:9
pubmed: 21294911
Respir Care. 2011 Mar;56(3):306-13
pubmed: 21235844
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):283
pubmed: 34773985
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):342-50
pubmed: 7847645
Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;92(12):1546-55
pubmed: 22976446
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):849-59
pubmed: 24247473
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 16;9:35
pubmed: 21575208
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):139-45
pubmed: 26343745
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 May 15;189(10):1214-24
pubmed: 24716641
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;13(1):
pubmed: 36611316
Appl Ergon. 2010 Jan;41(1):58-61
pubmed: 19450792
J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:163-169
pubmed: 29494941
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 29;19:127
pubmed: 25888469
Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;46(8):1238-1246
pubmed: 29727365
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(23):1812-8
pubmed: 19031208
Thorax. 2018 Oct;73(10):926-935
pubmed: 29980655
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):261-8
pubmed: 18511703
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1115-23
pubmed: 19711195
Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jan;45(1):18-25
pubmed: 22190301
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Dec;30(12):2245-52
pubmed: 15650867
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 18;12(1):26
pubmed: 35303201
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1427-1435
pubmed: 32931188
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 May 01;30(4):265-270
pubmed: 29385454
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 13;26(1):175
pubmed: 35698237
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 22;14(1):215
pubmed: 28003033
PM R. 2023 Jan;15(1):31-40
pubmed: 35138036
Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):1-9
pubmed: 30181091
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct-Dec;23(5-6):437-44
pubmed: 22526075
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):725-738
pubmed: 27025938
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):740-749
pubmed: 35584344
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Mar;35(3):550-5
pubmed: 18982308
Am J Nurs. 2008 Apr;108(4):52-62; quiz 62-3
pubmed: 18367931
Crit Care. 2020 Sep 25;24(1):577
pubmed: 32977833
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 Dec;31(12):721-7
pubmed: 6418786
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22
pubmed: 20298572
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 16;25(1):69
pubmed: 33593406
Anaesthesia. 1997 Jan;52(1):15-23
pubmed: 9014540
Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;92(12):1556-63
pubmed: 22577064
Thorax. 2018 Mar;73(3):213-221
pubmed: 28780504
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):65-72
pubmed: 34972844
Thorax. 2017 Oct;72(10):884-892
pubmed: 28108621
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3578-3584
pubmed: 33413910
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 14;23(1):12
pubmed: 30642377
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304
pubmed: 21470008
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Oct;66(10):1173-1183
pubmed: 31147985
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020 Jul/Sep;43(3):153-158
pubmed: 30807554
J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):77-86
pubmed: 22520490
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):1038-43
pubmed: 20213068
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9
pubmed: 21946660
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1995 Dec;95(12):712-7
pubmed: 8557555
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Respir Care. 2015 Aug;60(8):1097-104
pubmed: 25759461
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33
pubmed: 30892478
Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11):3599-605
pubmed: 11098960
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Feb;51(2):189-97
pubmed: 17261146
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct 1;194(7):831-844
pubmed: 26974173
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018 Mar;21(2):110-115
pubmed: 29232263
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):859-68
pubmed: 26963329
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 13;11(1):121
pubmed: 35698213
JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1591-600
pubmed: 24108501
Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1316-1326
pubmed: 25742048
J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):474.e7-13
pubmed: 24581949
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19:52
pubmed: 25882719
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;156(4 Pt 1):1120-8
pubmed: 9351611
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Jun;43:377-382
pubmed: 34024543
PLoS One. 2017 May 2;12(5):e0176946
pubmed: 28464024
Arch Physiother. 2022 Dec 18;13(1):2
pubmed: 36597159
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):343-351
pubmed: 31690160
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Oct 25;33(3):374-383
pubmed: 35107548
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Apr;51(4):529-33
pubmed: 12657074
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;56(12):1137-41
pubmed: 14680660
Age Ageing. 2006 May;35(3):320; author reply 320
pubmed: 16513676
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157
pubmed: 29435801

Auteurs

T W Davies (TW)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. thomas.davies6@nhs.net.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK. thomas.davies6@nhs.net.

E Kelly (E)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.

R J J van Gassel (RJJ)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

M C G van de Poll (MCG)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

J Gunst (J)

Clinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

M P Casaer (MP)

Clinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

K B Christopher (KB)

Division of Renal Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

J C Preiser (JC)

Medical Direction, Erasme University Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

A Hill (A)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

K Gundogan (K)

Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.

A Reintam-Blaser (A)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

A-F Rousseau (AF)

Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium.

C Hodgson (C)

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 3/553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

D M Needham (DM)

Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

S J Schaller (SJ)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CVK, CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

T McClelland (T)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.

J J Pilkington (JJ)

Centre for Bioscience, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester, UK.

C M Sevin (CM)

Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

P E Wischmeyer (PE)

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC, Box 3094 Mail # 41, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 5692 HAFS27710, USA.

Z Y Lee (ZY)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Cardiac, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

D Govil (D)

Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta: The Medicty, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

L Chapple (L)

Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

L Denehy (L)

School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Allied Health, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

J C Montejo-González (JC)

Instituto de Investigación I+12, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

B Taylor (B)

Department of Research for Patient Care Services, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

D E Bear (DE)

Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

R M Pearse (RM)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.

A McNelly (A)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.

J Prowle (J)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.

Z A Puthucheary (ZA)

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Personnes › Tranches d'âge › Adulte › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › Phénomènes physiologiques de l'appareil locomoteur et du système nerveux › Phénomènes physiologiques du système locomoteur › Force musculaire › Force de la main › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › États, signes et symptômes pathologiques › Processus pathologiques › Caractéristiques de la maladie › Maladie grave › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › Établissements, main d'oeuvre et services de soins de santé › Services de santé › Réadaptation › Activités de la vie quotidienne › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › Qualité, accès, évaluation des soins de santé › Qualité des soins de santé › Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé › Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé › Évaluation de résultat (soins) › Résultat thérapeutique › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...
questionsmedicales.fr › Qualité, accès, évaluation des soins de santé › Qualité des soins de santé › Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé › Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé › Évaluation de résultat (soins) › A systematic review and meta-analysis of the...