Children and the US Social Safety Net: Balancing Disincentives for Adults and Benefits for Children.
Journal
The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association
ISSN: 1944-7965
Titre abrégé: J Econ Perspect
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9885204
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
medline:
1
4
2022
pubmed:
1
4
2022
entrez:
21
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A hallmark of every developed nation is the provision of a social safety net-a collection of public programs that deliver aid to the poor. Because of their higher rates of poverty, children are often a major beneficiary of safety net programs. Countries vary considerably in both the amount of safety net aid to children and the design of their programs. The United States provides less aid to families with children as a share of GDP (0.6 percent) than most countries: Among 37 OECD countries, only Turkey provides less, as shown in Figure 1. Countries that provide less aid to families with children have higher rates of child poverty. Among these same 37 countries, only Turkey and Costa Rica have higher child poverty rates than the United States. Why does the United States appear to be such an outlier in terms of the amount of aid it provides to families and child poverty rates? While there are likely multiple reasons, in this paper we focus on one possible explanation: Past emphasis on the negative behavioral effects of safety net programs for families over the benefits of such programs for children.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37986734
doi: 10.1257/jep.36.2.149
pmc: PMC10659762
mid: NIHMS1894449
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
149-174Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P2C HD041022
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet. 1989 Sep 9;2(8663):577-80
pubmed: 2570282
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Summer;25(3):153-172
pubmed: 25152565
J Public Econ. 2010 Feb 1;94(1-2):114-128
pubmed: 21804653
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Apr;106(4):935-971
pubmed: 28713169
Rev Econ Stud. 2020 Mar;87(2):792-821
pubmed: 32863441
Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Aug 11;75(4):534-562
pubmed: 21643514
Am Econ Rev. ;97(5):1583-610
pubmed: 29135212
J Polit Econ. 2020 Jul;128(7):2502-2541
pubmed: 32616965
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1263-79
pubmed: 21688900