Repulsive Aftereffects of Visual Space.
aftereffects
space perception
visual adaptation
Journal
Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2411-5150
Titre abrégé: Vision (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101733282
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
29
09
2023
revised:
08
11
2023
accepted:
13
11
2023
medline:
21
11
2023
pubmed:
21
11
2023
entrez:
21
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prolonged exposure to a sensory stimulus induces perceptual adaptation aftereffects. Traditionally, aftereffects are known to change the appearance of stimulus features, like contrast, color, or shape. However, shifts in the spatial position of objects have also been observed to follow adaptation. Here, I demonstrate that visual adaptation produced by different adapter stimuli generates a bi-directional spatial repulsion. Observers had to judge the distance between a probe dot pair presented in the adapted region and compare them to a reference dot pair presented in a region not affected by adaptation. If the probe dot pair was present inside the adapted area, observers underestimated the distance. If, however, the dot pair straddled the adapted area, the distance was perceived as larger with a stronger distance expansion than compression. Bi-directional spatial repulsion was found with a similar magnitude for size and density adapters. Localization estimates with mouse pointing revealed that adaptation also affected absolute position judgments. Bi-directional spatial repulsion is most likely produced by the lines of adapter stimuli since single bars used as adapters were sufficient to induce spatial repulsion. Spatial repulsion was stronger for stimuli presented in the periphery. This finding explains why distance expansion is stronger than distance compression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37987293
pii: vision7040073
doi: 10.3390/vision7040073
pmc: PMC10661249
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 757184
Pays : International
Références
Perception. 2008;37(1):57-78
pubmed: 18399248
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 1;1:547-567
pubmed: 26858985
J Vis. 2002;2(4):302-11
pubmed: 12678580
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193-216
pubmed: 11520932
J Vis. 2019 Jun 3;19(6):23
pubmed: 31251807
J Vis. 2011 Dec 20;11(14):
pubmed: 22186273
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;11:331
pubmed: 28701936
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;83(4):2453-7
pubmed: 10758146
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 21;6:32810
pubmed: 27650296
Nature. 2004 Apr 1;428(6982):557-61
pubmed: 15058304
J Vis. 2017 Jul 1;17(8):9
pubmed: 28719913
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Mar;17(3):713-31
pubmed: 16648452
Psychol Rev. 1966 Mar;73(2):128-50
pubmed: 5324743
Curr Biol. 2016 Jul 25;26(14):1911-5
pubmed: 27426520
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1315-41
pubmed: 9778826
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15999-6008
pubmed: 24089504
Perception. 1986;15(5):603-12
pubmed: 3588220
Psychol Bull. 1957 Jul;54(4):327-38
pubmed: 13465926
J Exp Psychol. 1970 Aug;85(2):165-70
pubmed: 5482019
Perception. 2011;40(5):628-30
pubmed: 21882726
Science. 1969 Oct 10;166(3902):245-7
pubmed: 5809598
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):363-71
pubmed: 19254238
J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Jun;53(6):1573-7
pubmed: 4719254
J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):8
pubmed: 29228141
Vision Res. 1967 May;7(5):427-39
pubmed: 5613304
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3125-31
pubmed: 17936871
Spat Vis. 1985;1(2):113-29
pubmed: 3940053
Science. 1997 May 9;276(5314):949-52
pubmed: 9139658