Tubeless PCNL versus standard PCNL for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a propensity score matching analysis.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Surgery
Tubeless
Upper urinary tract
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Nov 2023
21 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
31
07
2023
accepted:
27
10
2023
medline:
21
11
2023
pubmed:
21
11
2023
entrez:
21
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In this study, the feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones was investigated. From January 2021 to December 2022, the clinical data of 273 patients who received tubeless PCNL (Group A) were studied. The control group includes clinical data from 302 patients (from January 2019 to October 2022) who received standard PCNL (Group B). The baseline characteristics were consistent between the two groups after using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compare the preoperative clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, residual stones, catheterization time, and hospital stay between the two groups. 146 pairs of patients were successfully paired through PSM. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time, blood leukocyte counts, haemoglobin decrease, fever, urinary extravasation, sepsis, bleeding, blood transfusion rates, embolism, and residual stones after surgery between the two groups; Postoperative day 1 and discharge day, the VAS pain score in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B. The catheterization time and hospitalization time of patients in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting suitable patients for tubeless PCNL is safe and effective, while significantly alleviating pain and reducing catheterization time and hospital stay.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37987954
doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03872-y
pii: 10.1007/s11255-023-03872-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 82070724
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province
ID : 1908085MH246
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35(9):1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
Moe OW (2006) Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet 367(9507):333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68071-9
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68071-9
Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, Meng J (2017) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol 17(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0
doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0
Zeng G, Zhong W, Pearle M et al (2022) European association of urology section of urolithiasis and international alliance of urolithiasis joint consensus on percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol Focus 8(2):588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.008
Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Ozkardes H (2010) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless? Urology 75(5):1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.104
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.104
Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD et al (2003) Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol 17(6):411–414. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277903767923218
doi: 10.1089/089277903767923218
Rana AM, Mithani S (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol 21(2):169–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0192
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0192
Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter? J Endourol 22(2):273–275. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0162
doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0162
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: american urological association/endourological society guideline, PART II. J Urol 196(4):1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64799-2
Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH (2008) Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22(2):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0034
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0034
Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH (2008) A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 180(2):612–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020
Borges CF, Fregonesi A, Silva DC, Sasse AD (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy [published online ahead of print, 2010 Oct 19]. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0231
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0231
Chung HS, Jung SI, Yu HS et al (2016) Modified totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it an effective and safe treatment option for renal and upper ureteral stones? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 11(4):240–246. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.64447
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.64447
Agrawal MS, Agrawal M (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indian J Urol 26(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60438
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60438
Aghamir SM, Mohammadi A, Mosavibahar SH, Meysamie AP (2008) Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal anomalies. J Endourol 22(9):2131–2134. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0015
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0015
Jun-Ou J, Lojanapiwat B (2010) Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety? Int Braz J Urol 36(2):171–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382010000200006
doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000200006
Wang CJ, Chang CH, Huang SW (2011) Simultaneous bilateral tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn stones: a prospective randomized controlled study. Urol Res 39(4):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0342-x
doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0342-x
Lee JY, Kim KH, Kim MD, Chung DY, Cho KS (2014) Intraoperative patient selection for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Surg 99(5):662–668. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00120.1
doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00120.1
Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S et al (2013) Failure of initial renal arterial embolization for severe post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy hemorrhage: a multicenter study of risk factors. J Urol 190(6):2133–2138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.085
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.085
Gauhar V, Traxer O, García Rojo E et al (2022) Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urolithiasis 50(5):511–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y
doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y
Xiao F, Xun Y, Hu W, Xia Q, Zhang J (2022) Transcatheter angiographic embolization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy-related bleeding: a single-center experience. Int J Clin Pract 2022:4422547. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4422547
doi: 10.1155/2022/4422547
Ahmad M, Mumtaz H, Hussain HU et al (2022) A prospective, single-centered, cohort study comparing the treatment of renal stones by following PCNL types: standard, tubeless & totally tubeless. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 80:104325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104325
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104325
Mao YH, Huang CP, Li TC et al (2021) Case selection and implementation of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl Androl Urol 10(8):3415–3422. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-559
doi: 10.21037/tau-21-559
Shen P, Liu Y, Wang J (2012) Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 88(3):298–306. https://doi.org/10.1159/000332151
doi: 10.1159/000332151