Factual corrections: Concerns and current evidence.

Corrections Fact-checks Misinformation

Journal

Current opinion in psychology
ISSN: 2352-2518
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Psychol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101649136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 29 08 2023
revised: 11 10 2023
accepted: 18 10 2023
medline: 22 11 2023
pubmed: 22 11 2023
entrez: 21 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Factual corrections that target misinformation improve belief accuracy. They do so across a wide variety of countries, political beliefs and demographic characteristics. Instances of backfire, wherein exposure to corrections reduce accuracy, are exceedingly rare and may be an artifact of research design. The evidence regarding other common concerns is mixed. While the effects on corrections on belief are not permanent, they are not entirely ephemeral, either. With some exceptions, corrections mostly only affect belief accuracy, with minor to nonexistent influence on downstream attitudes and behaviors. While corrections are not unpopular among the public, limited available evidence suggests that those who see misinformation are exceedingly unlikely to see relevant corrections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37988954
pii: S2352-250X(23)00160-4
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101715
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101715

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ethan Porter (E)

George Washington University, USA. Electronic address: evporter@gwu.edu.

Thomas J Wood (TJ)

Ohio State University, USA. Electronic address: wood.1080@osu.edu.

Classifications MeSH