Initiatives to increase colonoscopy capacity - is there an impact on polyp detection? A UK National Endoscopy Database analysis.


Journal

Endoscopy
ISSN: 1438-8812
Titre abrégé: Endoscopy
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0215166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 22 11 2023
pubmed: 22 11 2023
entrez: 21 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Background Mismatch between routine endoscopy capacity and demand means centres often implement initiatives to increase capacity, such as weekend working or using locums/agency staff (insourcing). There are concerns about whether increasing workload to meet demand could negatively impact quality. We investigated polyp detection, a key quality metric, in weekend vs weekday and insourced vs standard procedures using data from the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED). Methods We conducted a national retrospective cross-sectional study of diagnostic colonoscopies undertaken 01/01-04/04/2019. The primary outcome was mean number of polyps (MNP) and the secondary, polyp detection rate (PDR). Multi-level mixed-effect regression, fitting endoscopist as a random effect, was used to examine associations between procedure day (weekend/weekday) and type (insourced/standard) and these outcomes, adjusting for patient age, sex and indication. Results 92,879 colonoscopies (weekends: 19,977 (21.5%); insourced: 9,909 (10.7%)) were performed by 2,496 endoscopists. For weekend colonoscopies, patients were more often female and less often having screening-related procedures; for insourced colonoscopies, patients were younger and less often attending for screening-related procedures (all p<0.05). Case-mix adjusted MNP was significantly lower for weekend vs weekday (IRR=0.86, (95%CI 0.83-0.89)) and for insourced vs standard procedures (IRR=0.91, (95%CI 0.87-0.95)). MNP was highest for weekday standard procedures and lowest for weekend insourced procedures, but there was no interaction between procedure day and type. Similar associations were found for PDR. Conclusions Strategies to increase colonoscopy capacity may have adverse effects on polyp detection. Routine quality monitoring should be undertaken following such initiatives. Meantime, reasons for this unwarranted variation require investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37989199
doi: 10.1055/a-2214-9840
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Health Foundation
ID : AIMS ID 695428

Informations de copyright

The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

LS holds grants for endoscopy-related research from 3-D Matrix and Medtronic. The remaining authors declare that there is no conflict of interest declare

Auteurs

Liya Lu (L)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Jamie Catlow (J)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Matthew David Rutter (MD)

Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Linda Sharp (L)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Classifications MeSH